Van Jackson

In this engaging discussion, historian Michael Brenes and international relations expert Van Jackson delve into their book, exploring how the U.S.-China rivalry reshapes domestic politics and weakens democracy. They reveal how framing this relationship as a geopolitical threat encourages neo-McCarthyism and detracts crucial resources from social welfare. The duo critiques the bipartisan consensus driving security-heavy policies and advocates for a new 'geopolitics of peace,' emphasizing cooperation over conflict. Their insights challenge conventional narratives and propose a refreshing approach to international relations.

Van Jackson, a Professor of International Relations at Victoria University of Wellington, critiques the latest U.S. National Security Strategy's contradictions. He discusses how ideology mixes with military ambition and the implications for global relations. Jackson highlights the document's imperialistic undertones, especially regarding Latin America and Venezuela, and examines the challenges of military interventions in defeating cartels. The conversation reveals the complex dynamics of U.S. foreign policy amid rising tensions with China and shifting geopolitical landscapes.

Van Jackson, a leading left foreign policy expert, discusses the potential foreign policy of a left-wing government in the U.S. He explores how a progressive perspective differs from traditional liberal internationalism, delving into issues like human rights abuses, Ukraine, and global insecurity. Jackson challenges the predominant hawkish views in DC think tanks and advocates for a more nuanced approach to international relations.

Jacob talks with Dr. Van Jackson, an influential international relations scholar focusing on East Asian and Pacific security. They delve into the volatility of U.S. foreign policy, labeling the Trump era as a counter-revolutionary oligarchy. Van critiques both major parties for risking diversionary wars amid legitimacy crises. The dialogue navigates the geopolitical tensions involving Iran, Israel, and China, and explores possibilities for a 'win-win-win' scenario on the Korean Peninsula as U.S. troop withdrawal from South Korea is contemplated.

A panel of political scientists and experts at Australian National University discuss 'whataboutism' in the China debate, addressing comparisons made between China's actions and other countries' historical actions. They explore the ethical and political aspects of whataboutism, including its effects on public debate, the destructive power of whataboutism in politics, challenges in foreign policy, and the role of academics in advancing national interest.