Law professor Richard Hasen from UCLA discusses the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, highlighting the implications for holding Trump accountable for his actions. The episode explores the division among justices, the distinctions between absolute and presumptive immunity, and the potential impact on future legal precedents. It also reflects on the consequences of the ruling on Trump's other criminal prosecutions and the political repercussions, including the possibility of impeachment proceedings against justices.

Authors Richard Hasen and Lawrence Lessig, along with editor Sarah Isgur, discuss vulnerabilities in the American election system and propose constitutional amendments to enhance election integrity. They delve into topics such as universal voter registration, election security, challenges surrounding the 2024 election, and the Senate's role in judging elections. The conversation highlights the importance of safeguarding voting rights and addressing potential risks in democratic processes.

Legal expert Richard Hasen discusses the Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity from prosecution and the potential implications for his future if he regains the White House. The podcast delves into concerns over authoritarian tendencies, distinguishing official acts from personal ones, and the challenges in holding a former president accountable for actions while in office.

Legal expert Richard Hasen discusses the Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity, highlighting delays in the insurrection trial and the potential abuse of powers if Trump wins re-election. The discussion covers nuances of presidential immunity, threats to democracy, and the implications of a ruling on Trump's post-presidency actions.

Law professor Richard Hasen from UCLA discusses the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, particularly focusing on the implications for Trump. The ruling distinguishes between absolute and presumptive immunity for official acts, raising concerns about accountability and the challenges of prosecuting a president. The podcast explores the complexity of differentiating between official and unofficial actions, highlighting the potential impact on future criminal cases involving Trump.