How Supreme Court Shocker Could Give Trump Truly Terrifying New Powers
Jul 2, 2024
auto_awesome
Legal expert Richard Hasen discusses the Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity from prosecution and the potential implications for his future if he regains the White House. The podcast delves into concerns over authoritarian tendencies, distinguishing official acts from personal ones, and the challenges in holding a former president accountable for actions while in office.
The Supreme Court ruling grants Trump delayed trial for insurrection crimes, potentially allowing abuse of power if re-elected.
The distinction between absolute and presumed immunity for official acts post-presidency raises concerns about accountability and legal standards.
Deep dives
Court Ruling on Trump's Immunity from Prosecution
The Supreme Court ruled on Donald Trump's immunity from prosecution post-presidency, granting absolute immunity for official acts within the President's constitutional powers, but establishing presumed immunity for other official acts. This ruling delays Trump's potential trial for January 6th related crimes until after the election, impacting Chief Justice John Roberts' legacy.
Challenges in Determining Official Acts and Immunity
The distinction between official acts enjoying absolute versus presumed immunity was discussed, highlighting the complexity in determining which actions fall under each category. Examples such as military orders, discussions with government officials, and public speeches were analyzed for their level of immunity from prosecution.
Implications of Court's Ruling on Presidential Powers and Rule of Law
The podcast explored the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on presidential powers and the rule of law. Concerns were raised about the potential abuse of immunity leading to impunity for former presidents like Trump, affecting the checks and balances system. The discussion pointed out the risks to the rule of law when immunity is extended too broadly and the need for accountability in upholding legal standards.
Yesterday the Supreme Court released its shocking new ruling in the case involving Donald Trump’s demand for absolute immunity from prosecution for insurrection-related crimes. The court gave Trump much of what he wanted, notably ensuring that his trial for the insurrection will be delayed indefinitely. But what’s really worrying is what this ruling could allow Trump to get away with if he wins back the White House. We talked to legal expert Richard Hasen, who just published A Real Right to Vote and regularly writes about Trump’s attacks on democracy, about why the case for alarmism is real and serious.