What Next | Daily News and Analysis
How Bad is the Trump Immunity Ruling?
Jul 2, 2024
Law professor Richard Hasen from UCLA discusses the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, highlighting the implications for holding Trump accountable for his actions. The episode explores the division among justices, the distinctions between absolute and presumptive immunity, and the potential impact on future legal precedents. It also reflects on the consequences of the ruling on Trump's other criminal prosecutions and the political repercussions, including the possibility of impeachment proceedings against justices.
27:35
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court ruling grants extensive immunity to presidents, blurring the line between official and unofficial actions in court cases.
- The decision reflects a shift in power towards the courts, raising concerns about checks and balances and prioritizing democratic protection.
Deep dives
Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity
The Supreme Court's recent ruling established extensive immunity for presidents, offering absolute immunity for core constitutional duties and presumptive immunity for duties within official responsibility. This decision impacts cases of criminal prosecution against presidents, leaving a blurred line between official and unofficial actions and complicating evidence presentation in court.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
