Michael S. Schmidt

In this engaging discussion, investigative reporter Michael S. Schmidt, known for his insights on the Trump administration, reveals how Trump’s retribution tactics are reshaping the legal landscape. He focuses on the law firm Perkins Coie, detailing its challenges following a controversial executive order aimed at punishing dissenters. The conversation highlights the potential chilling effect on law firms and underscores the implications for the right to a robust defense, raising critical questions about the intersection of politics and the legal profession.

Nicole Perlroth, a former lead cybersecurity reporter, Michael Schmidt, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a former NSC director, delve into the ominous world of cybersecurity threats. They discuss how adversaries like China have infiltrated U.S. critical infrastructure, the urgent need for enhanced defense strategies, and the troubling trend of defunding cybersecurity efforts. The conversation touches on the implications of AI in cyber warfare and the complex relationship between national security and civil liberties in this digital age.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times who covered the Matt Gaetz saga, offers insider insights into Gaetz's abrupt withdrawal from the attorney general race. He highlights the ethical scrutiny surrounding Gaetz, including allegations of misconduct and the implications of private findings from the House Ethics Committee. The conversation also touches on the broader political fallout for Senate Republicans and the challenges of handling controversies within Trump's administration, amplifying the theme of accountability in politics.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, delves into the implications of a potential second Trump presidency. The discussion highlights Trump's history of seeking revenge against political foes and how this approach could reshape federal agencies. Schmidt reveals the chilling use of governmental power for personal vendettas and the concerning threat to democratic norms. Listeners gain insights into retaliation against rivals like John Kerry, and the unsettling reality of what a vindictive political culture could mean for the future.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, joins forces with political correspondent Lisa Lerer, reporters Reid J. Epstein and Nate Cohn, to unpack the tumultuous political climate as the election nears. They discuss John Kelly's alarming remarks about Trump’s fascist tendencies and how Kamala Harris is leveraging these perceptions to rally voters. The conversation navigates Harris's campaign strategies, the shifting polling data, and the implications of viral antics in today's campaigning, all painting a vivid picture of the contentious political landscape.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter with The New York Times known for his work on the Chinese swimming doping scandal, dives deep into a brewing doping controversy as the Paris Olympics near. He discusses shocking allegations against Chinese swimmers who tested positive yet continued competing, raising grave concerns about fairness in the sport. Schmidt highlights athletes' frustrations with current doping regulations and WADA's handling of the accusations, questioning the integrity of the Olympics and trust in competitive sports.

Michael S. Schmidt, a national security reporter for The New York Times, dives into the intricate web of political maneuvering involving President Trump and Ukraine. He discusses a whistleblower complaint that suggests attempts to leverage foreign interference against Joe Biden. The conversation reveals the controversial phone call between Trump and Ukraine's president, raising questions about military aid and the implications of potential quid pro quo. Schmidt also touches on Biden's reaction, framing the situation as an abuse of power and highlighting the ongoing narrative of corruption.

Michael Schmidt, a New York Times investigative reporter, teams up with Stephen Miller, former senior advisor to Trump, for an intense discussion. They dive deep into the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Trump administration, including judicial tensions and allegations of contempt. The duo also confronts the economic challenges stemming from Trump's policies and the implications for U.S.-Europe relations. Additionally, they highlight pressing public health risks like H5 bird flu and the urgent need for improved biosecurity measures.

Maggie Haberman, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, and Michael S. Schmidt, a national security expert, dissect John Bolton's explosive revelations against President Trump. They delve into the implications of Bolton's claims linking Trump to a quid pro quo in Ukraine, which could shift the impeachment trial's trajectory. The discussion uncovers Bolton's hesitance to testify and the political dynamics at play, revealing how his forthcoming book may alter Senate Republicans' strategies for acquittal.

Michael S. Schmidt, a New York Times reporter focused on national security, joins third grader Leo, an enthusiastic observer of the impeachment inquiry. They explore how kids perceive complex political events, showcasing Leo's curiosity and insights. The discussion delves into historical impeachments and the meaning of 'quid pro quo,' making these topics relatable for young listeners. As public hearings unfold, Leo's innocent reflections bring a fresh perspective on serious issues, highlighting the generational divide in understanding politics.