Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times who covered the Matt Gaetz saga, offers insider insights into Gaetz's abrupt withdrawal from the attorney general race. He highlights the ethical scrutiny surrounding Gaetz, including allegations of misconduct and the implications of private findings from the House Ethics Committee. The conversation also touches on the broader political fallout for Senate Republicans and the challenges of handling controversies within Trump's administration, amplifying the theme of accountability in politics.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, delves into the implications of a potential second Trump presidency. The discussion highlights Trump's history of seeking revenge against political foes and how this approach could reshape federal agencies. Schmidt reveals the chilling use of governmental power for personal vendettas and the concerning threat to democratic norms. Listeners gain insights into retaliation against rivals like John Kerry, and the unsettling reality of what a vindictive political culture could mean for the future.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, joins forces with political correspondent Lisa Lerer, reporters Reid J. Epstein and Nate Cohn, to unpack the tumultuous political climate as the election nears. They discuss John Kelly's alarming remarks about Trump’s fascist tendencies and how Kamala Harris is leveraging these perceptions to rally voters. The conversation navigates Harris's campaign strategies, the shifting polling data, and the implications of viral antics in today's campaigning, all painting a vivid picture of the contentious political landscape.

Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter with The New York Times known for his work on the Chinese swimming doping scandal, dives deep into a brewing doping controversy as the Paris Olympics near. He discusses shocking allegations against Chinese swimmers who tested positive yet continued competing, raising grave concerns about fairness in the sport. Schmidt highlights athletes' frustrations with current doping regulations and WADA's handling of the accusations, questioning the integrity of the Olympics and trust in competitive sports.

Michael S. Schmidt, a national security reporter for The New York Times, dives into the intricate web of political maneuvering involving President Trump and Ukraine. He discusses a whistleblower complaint that suggests attempts to leverage foreign interference against Joe Biden. The conversation reveals the controversial phone call between Trump and Ukraine's president, raising questions about military aid and the implications of potential quid pro quo. Schmidt also touches on Biden's reaction, framing the situation as an abuse of power and highlighting the ongoing narrative of corruption.

Maggie Haberman, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, and Michael S. Schmidt, a national security expert, dissect John Bolton's explosive revelations against President Trump. They delve into the implications of Bolton's claims linking Trump to a quid pro quo in Ukraine, which could shift the impeachment trial's trajectory. The discussion uncovers Bolton's hesitance to testify and the political dynamics at play, revealing how his forthcoming book may alter Senate Republicans' strategies for acquittal.

Michael S. Schmidt, a New York Times reporter focused on national security, joins third grader Leo, an enthusiastic observer of the impeachment inquiry. They explore how kids perceive complex political events, showcasing Leo's curiosity and insights. The discussion delves into historical impeachments and the meaning of 'quid pro quo,' making these topics relatable for young listeners. As public hearings unfold, Leo's innocent reflections bring a fresh perspective on serious issues, highlighting the generational divide in understanding politics.

Michael S. Schmidt, a national security and federal investigations reporter for The New York Times, provides insider analysis on a historic impeachment hearing. He discusses the tense climate as William B. Taylor Jr. and George P. Kent reveal the complexities of U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine. The conversation delves into the implications of tying military aid to political investigations and highlights the fierce partisan divides in Congress. Listeners will gain insight into how this inquiry could influence the 2020 election and reshape presidential accountability.

Michael S. Schmidt, a national security and federal investigations reporter for The New York Times, joins curious third grader Leo for a lighthearted yet insightful discussion. They navigate the complexities of impeachment, with Leo's innocent questions shedding new light on the term 'whistleblower.' Schmidt explains the political dynamics surrounding the impeachment inquiry, particularly the U.S. president's actions towards Ukraine. Their conversation blends engaging childlike curiosity with serious political analysis, making a complex topic more accessible.

Michael S. Schmidt, a Washington correspondent for The New York Times, sheds light on Gordon Sondland's dramatic change in testimony regarding the impeachment investigation. Sondland, initially claiming ignorance, now confirms direct pressure from Trump's administration on Ukraine for an inquiry into the Bidens. The discussion dives into Sondland's unique journey from hotelier to ambassador and the political implications of his reversal. Schmidt also highlights the impact of this testimony on ongoing inquiries and the media's role in unveiling the truth.