Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, joins forces with political correspondent Lisa Lerer, reporters Reid J. Epstein and Nate Cohn, to unpack the tumultuous political climate as the election nears. They discuss John Kelly's alarming remarks about Trump’s fascist tendencies and how Kamala Harris is leveraging these perceptions to rally voters. The conversation navigates Harris's campaign strategies, the shifting polling data, and the implications of viral antics in today's campaigning, all painting a vivid picture of the contentious political landscape.
John Kelly's characterization of Trump as a fascist raises critical concerns about authoritarianism and its threats to democracy during the election.
Kamala Harris's strategy focuses on appealing to moderate and traditionally conservative voters by emphasizing candidate character over policy issues.
Deep dives
Partnership for Innovation in Biotech
Amgen, a prominent biotechnology firm, has sought collaboration with a global financial entity to enhance its therapeutic portfolio and expedite the process of delivering innovative medicines to global markets. They found a suitable partner in Citi, whose integrated banking and market services facilitate comprehensive financial advice and support for transactions worldwide. This partnership is aimed at broadening Amgen's product pipeline, thus allowing for the more rapid introduction of new therapies to patients in need. The collaboration underscores the importance of financial backing in advancing biopharmaceutical advancements and accessibility.
Concerns Over Trump's Authoritarianism
John Kelly, former Chief of Staff to Donald Trump, has voiced alarming concerns about Trump's potential re-election, suggesting it could lead to authoritarianism. Kelly characterizes Trump as someone who aligns with fascist principles, illustrating his beliefs through observations of Trump's rhetoric and behavior. He expressed grave apprehension at Trump's recent statements suggesting the military could be used against Americans, which Kelly regards as crossing a crucial line. This perspective emphasizes the increasing fears surrounding Trump's influence and the implications for democratic governance.
Kamala Harris and The Character Argument
Kamala Harris has strategically positioned her campaign message around the character and fitness of presidential candidates, directly relating it to comments made by John Kelly. By highlighting Kelly's observations regarding Trump's leadership and mentality, Harris aims to paint Trump as unfit for office in her closing arguments during the campaign. This approach seeks to resonate with moderate voters who may have reservations about Trump's conduct while aligning with the values of discipline and selflessness deemed crucial in leadership. As the election approaches, this message may play a decisive role in swaying conflicted voters who prioritize character over policy.
Engaging Moderate Voters
Harris's campaign seeks to engage traditionally conservative voters, particularly women disillusioned by Trump's rhetoric, by presenting herself as a viable alternative. Collaborations with figures like Liz Cheney in key battleground states serve to attract those who may be hesitant to publicly endorse Harris due to party loyalty. The campaign identifies a contingent of 'shy voters'—Republican voters in private who may support Harris, allowing them to preserve their conservative identity while voting for change. This nuanced approach seeks to broaden Harris's appeal by acknowledging the complexities of voter sentiment in the current political landscape.
With less than two weeks to go in the race for the presidency, Donald Trump’s longest-serving White House chief of staff is warning that he met the definition of a fascist, Kamala Harris is seizing on the message of Mr. Trump as a threat to democracy and Mr. Trump himself is relying on viral stunts and vulgarity to break through to undecided voters.
The Times journalists Michael Barbaro, Michael S. Schmidt, Lisa Lerer, Reid J. Epstein and Nate Cohn try to make sense of it all.
Guests:
Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, covering Washington
Lisa Lerer, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
Reid J. Epstein, a New York Times reporter covering politics.
Nate Cohn, the chief political analyst for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode