In this discussion, Kate Zernike, a national reporter for The New York Times focusing on abortion rights, highlights how voters favored abortion rights measures while rejecting Kamala Harris. She delves into the strategic changes post-Roe v. Wade, emphasizing significant ballot successes in states like Arizona and Nevada. Personal stories reveal the emotional toll of restrictive laws, while the disconnect between public support for abortion rights and electoral outcomes raises questions about the Democratic Party's future strategies. It's a revealing look at the evolving politics surrounding abortion.

Kate Zernike, a national correspondent for The New York Times, and Kate Cox, the central figure in a major abortion case in Texas, discuss the legal process and the impact on medical exceptions to the state's abortion bans. The episode explores Cox's experience, arguments made in court, and the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on a commonly used abortion pill.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade this year, it appeared to be an unvarnished victory for the anti-abortion movement.But as the year draws to a close, the realities of a post-Roe America are turning out differently than anyone predicted.Guest: Kate Zernike, a national correspondent for The New York Times.Background reading: After the midterms, abortion rights advocates hope to harness public support for the long term, while anti-abortion campaigners look to advance new laws.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.  Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Kate Zernike, a journalist focusing on abortion rights, discusses the critical ballot measures in Arizona and their potential implications for the Democratic Party. She explores how abortion access might boost voter turnout in crucial swing states. Hunter Biden opens up about his controversial foreign business dealings and the scrutiny surrounding them amid ongoing trials. The podcast also touches on the tense Gaza negotiations, with Hamas's absence complicating peace efforts and raising concerns about regional stability.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the court’s conservative majority argued it was simply handing the question of abortion to the states and their voters to decide for themselves.But in reality, the court was ensuring that many states, from Arizona to Ohio, would immediately ban the procedure without much debate, because their legislatures are now dominated by hard-line Republicans. Today, we tell the story of how those Republican legislators achieved that dominance.Guest: Kate Zernike, a political reporter for The New York Times.Want more from The Daily? For one big idea on the news each week from our team, subscribe to our newsletter. Background reading: How the beginning of the end of Roe v. Wade arrived on election night in November 2010.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.  Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.