The Daily
Why Abortion Rights Won Even as Kamala Harris Lost
Nov 12, 2024
In this discussion, Kate Zernike, a national reporter for The New York Times focusing on abortion rights, highlights how voters favored abortion rights measures while rejecting Kamala Harris. She delves into the strategic changes post-Roe v. Wade, emphasizing significant ballot successes in states like Arizona and Nevada. Personal stories reveal the emotional toll of restrictive laws, while the disconnect between public support for abortion rights and electoral outcomes raises questions about the Democratic Party's future strategies. It's a revealing look at the evolving politics surrounding abortion.
25:25
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Seven out of ten states successfully passed abortion rights measures, highlighting a significant shift in public support for reproductive healthcare.
- Despite strong voter approval for abortion rights, Kamala Harris's support notably lagged, revealing a complex relationship between policy and political preferences.
Deep dives
The Unexpected Success of Abortion Rights Ballot Measures
A significant number of states saw record ballot measures aimed at protecting abortion rights, with ten states putting amendments forward for voter approval. In a remarkable turn of events, abortion rights amendments succeeded in seven out of these ten states, translating to a 70 percent victory rate, marking a notable win for abortion rights advocates. This success was especially pronounced following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, as the measures sought to embed abortion protections into state constitutions. The victories reflect a growing public support for abortion access, shifting the political landscape around the issue.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
