Kate Zernike, a national correspondent for The New York Times, and Kate Cox, the central figure in a major abortion case in Texas, discuss the legal process and the impact on medical exceptions to the state's abortion bans. The episode explores Cox's experience, arguments made in court, and the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on a commonly used abortion pill.
The ambiguity surrounding exceptions to abortion bans in Texas and other states has led to an increasing number of cases being taken to court.
The legal challenges and wider impact of cases like Kate Cox's are changing the conversation and public perception around abortion, highlighting the need for clearer exceptions in the law.
Deep dives
Ambiguity in Abortion Ban Exceptions
The podcast discusses the ambiguity surrounding exceptions to abortion bans in Texas and other states. While most states have banned abortion, they allow exceptions in cases where the mother's life is in danger. However, the criteria for these exceptions are often unclear and open to interpretation. This ambiguity has led to an increasing number of cases being taken to court. The podcast features an interview with Kate Cox, a woman at the center of a major abortion case in Texas, who shares her personal experience and the challenges she faced due to the lack of clear exceptions.
Kate Cox's Case and the Hearing
The podcast explores Kate Cox's case and her hearing at a Texas court seeking a temporary restraining order to allow her to have an abortion. Kate Cox, who is pregnant with a fetus diagnosed with Trisomy 18, a severe medical condition, argues that the pregnancy poses risks to her health and future fertility. Her lawyer argues that she should be allowed an abortion based on the medical exception in Texas law. The judge grants the temporary restraining order, but the Texas Attorney General immediately appeals the ruling.
Legal Challenges and Impact
The podcast examines the legal challenges and wider impact of cases like Kate Cox's. It highlights how these cases are not unique and similar situations are being fought in courts across different states. The lawsuits aim to challenge the strict abortion bans and clarify the rules and exceptions around abortion. Importantly, these cases are changing the conversation and public perception around abortion, shifting the focus to the diverse circumstances in which women may seek abortion and the need for clearer exceptions in the law.
A major case in Texas this week drew attention to the question of who can get exempted from an abortion ban. Most states that have banned the procedure allow for rare exceptions, but while that might seem clear on paper, in practice, it’s far more ambiguous.
Kate Cox, the woman at the center of the case in Texas; and Kate Zernike, a national correspondent for The New York Times, talk about the legal process and its surprising effect.
Guest: Kate Zernike, a national correspondent for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode