Ilya Shapiro

Ilya Shapiro, a constitutional expert and author, dives into the contentious debates surrounding judicial interventions that block executive orders from the Trump administration. He highlights how district judges are challenging executive power, marking a potential shift in legal authority. Shapiro discusses the implications of recent rulings on military policies, USAID funding, and immigration enforcement, particularly focusing on the legal battles over the transgender military ban. This insightful analysis raises crucial questions about the balance of power in American governance.

In this engaging discussion, Ilya Shapiro, a conservative legal scholar, and Jeremy Peters, a New York Times journalist, dive into the heated topic of free speech in America today. They explore how the Trump administration's actions impact speech on campuses, especially concerning immigration policies. Shapiro highlights the dangers of selective free speech enforcement, while Peters warns against using aggressive measures to silence dissent. They also tackle the complexities of antisemitism and the challenges universities face in upholding free expression in today's polarized climate.

Stu Burguiere, host of BlazeTV's "Stu Does America," digs into Gavin Newsom's attempts to restore his political image while battling wildfires and critiques the failures of California's woke leadership. Ilya Shapiro, author of "Lawless," shares his experience with cancel culture in academia and the urgent need to free higher education from ideological constraints. They discuss the growing discontent among liberal voters, the challenges facing firefighters, and how college students can combat wokeness effectively from within.

Sheldon Whitehouse believes that libertarian legal scholars have undue influence on judges and proposes changes to their engagement with the judiciary. Ilya Shapiro comments on the influence of libertarian legal scholars. They discuss the impact of Cato's MECUS program, mandated disclosures, and the tension between disclosure and free speech.

Ilya Shapiro, a senior lecturer at Georgetown Center for the Constitution and author of "Lawless: The Miseducation of America's Elite," shares his experiences navigating the challenges of legal education. He critiques the impact of diversity initiatives on the training of future lawyers, reflecting on controversies like those at Stanford Law School. Shapiro discusses the growing influence of activism within elite institutions, the decline of academic rigor, and the pressures shaping law school culture today, including censorship and political agendas.

Constitutional scholars Ilya Shapiro, Stephen Vladeck, and Adam White delve into the controversial expansion of executive power during the Trump administration. They draw historical comparisons, highlighting concerns over the diminishing role of Congress and the rise of an imperial presidency. The discussion critiques judicial responses to executive actions and examines the current legitimacy crisis facing the judiciary. With reflections on the intricate relationship between the presidency and the courts, the scholars emphasize the need for institutional trust and political self-restraint.

In this discussion, Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and author of "Lawless," shares his insights on the evolving landscape of legal education. He recounts his personal encounters with cancel culture, particularly during his time at Georgetown. Shapiro also analyzes significant Supreme Court cases affecting free speech, including the TikTok ownership debate and Texas' age verification law. He emphasizes the need for open dialogue in academia and reflects on the ideological shifts within elite institutions.

In a captivating debate, Glenn Greenwald, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist known for his incisive views on politics, faces off against Ilya Shapiro, a constitutional law expert. They delve into the contentious topic of free speech on college campuses, particularly amid protests related to pro-Palestinian activism. The discussion highlights the balance between protecting rights and fostering open dialogue. Misconceptions surrounding the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act and the historical parallels to past protests further enrich the debate, revealing the complexities of activism in today's polarized environment.

Ilya Shapiro, a Manhattan Institute scholar, Jim Copland, who directs legal policy there, and Georgetown law professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz dive into the Supreme Court's 2024–25 term. They discuss pivotal topics such as age verification laws, pediatric gender care, and recent challenges to FDA regulations on flavored e-cigarettes. The panel also examines the complexities of sovereign immunity cases and highlights the court's evolving relationship with public opinion, making for a thought-provoking exploration of contemporary legal battles.

Guests: Ilya Shapiro (Manhattan Institute member), Robert George (Princeton), Randall Kennedy (Harvard Law School). Interesting topics discussed include Justice Thomas's engagement with natural law jurisprudence, his stance on Brown v. Board of Education, the loyalty trap, the differences between Thomas's, Scalia's, and Alito's originalisms, and the challenges faced by black conservatives.