Cato Daily Podcast cover image

Cato Daily Podcast

Are Libertarians Too Influential in Federal Court Decisions?

Mar 15, 2021
Sheldon Whitehouse believes that libertarian legal scholars have undue influence on judges and proposes changes to their engagement with the judiciary. Ilya Shapiro comments on the influence of libertarian legal scholars. They discuss the impact of Cato's MECUS program, mandated disclosures, and the tension between disclosure and free speech.
10:52

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Senator Whitehouse believes libertarian legal scholars have too much influence in federal court decisions.
  • Cato Institute's amicus program aims to influence both specific cases and public opinion through accessible briefs.

Deep dives

Senator Whitehouse's Beliefs on the Federal Judiciary

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse believes that conservative, originalist, and libertarian judges and legal scholars hold too much power in the federal judiciary. He attributes this power to the influence of so-called dark money, and has proposed legislation to require more disclosure of funding sources, travel by judges, and connections between organizations like the Cato Institute and the federal judiciary.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode