Last week, the Supreme Court handed down, as they usually do as the term comes to an end, a flurry of highly anticipated major decisions. Two of them made a lot of news: one effectively ended affirmative action in American higher education, and another ruled that a Colorado web designer could refuse to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple. The mainstream media’s prevailing sentiment over the last week has been that these are the sorry consequences of a conservative majority court. This court overturned Roe v. Wade last year in a major setback to women’s rights; now they’ve undone decades of precedent that helped historically disadvantaged students have a chance at the American dream, and they’ve weakened gay rights. When President Joe Biden was asked at a press conference last week whether or not this is a “rogue court,” Biden basically said yes. He muttered, “This isn’t a normal court.”  Is that true? Is this court “not normal”? Or do these decisions actually reflect a legitimate reading of the Constitution? To help separate signal from noise and fact from hyperbole, today we have three legal experts from different sides of the political aisle to hash it out. Harry Litman is an attorney who has clerked for two Supreme Court justices, Thurgood Marshall and Anthony Kennedy. He is also a host of the podcast Talking Feds. Jeannie Suk Gersen is a professor at Harvard Law School and writer for The New Yorker. She clerked for David Souter. And Sarah Isgur is a columnist for The Dispatch and an ABC News contributor. She clerked for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and served as the Justice Department spokeswoman during the Trump administration. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mea Culpa welcomes our old friend, Harry Litman, the former US Attorney and Deputy Assistant Attorney General. Litman is currently the legal affairs columnist for the Los Angeles Times and a professor of Constitutional Law at UCLA and UCSD. Harry can be seen as a legal and political commentator on CBS, NPR MSNBC, and CNN. Litman is also the creator and host of the Talking Feds Podcast. You’d be smart to subscribe to the “Talking Feds” YouTube channel. New episodes are posted daily. But today Harry is here to give us the rundown on all things Trump indictment. He is especially interested in Judge Cannon and the damage she could potentially do to the prosecution’s case. 

Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman discusses the Trump hush money trial, potential outcomes, and trial proceedings. Topics include witness testimonies, legal implications of false records, jury dynamics, and Trump's actions. The discussion delves into the defense strategies, challenges of prosecuting federal crimes, and potential consequences for Trump's future.

Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and host of "Talking Feds," provides insightful analysis on Trump’s latest legal challenges. Ben Terris, a Washington Post reporter and author, dives into the intriguing role of a DJ influencing Trump – and it’s more than just music. They explore Elon Musk's sway in politics, the rise of AI in business, and how Trump’s executive orders might reshape immigration policies. There's also a focused discussion on the state of political norms and media integrity, reflecting a pressing need for truth in journalism.

Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and host of Talking Feds, joins Michael Popok, who runs the Legal AF YouTube channel, to analyze Donald Trump's controversial nominations. They discuss the potential threats to the rule of law posed by nominees like Matt Gaetz and the implications of inflammatory rhetoric on governance. The duo also explores the concept of recess appointments and their repercussions on U.S. foreign relations, while emphasizing the need for reliable legal information in today’s charged political climate.

Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and host of 'Talking Feds', dives into Donald Trump's latest legal troubles, shedding light on the complex political landscape. Jeff Jarvis, director of the Tow Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism, discusses themes from his book 'The Web We Weave', emphasizing the urgent need to reclaim the internet from misinformation and corporate control. They also explore the impact of AI on journalism and democratic discourse, alongside the necessity for media accountability in today’s digital age.

Nancy Pelosi, former Speaker of the House and author, shares insights from her new book, highlighting the art of power in politics. Historian Heather Cox Richardson discusses the potential implications of Kamala Harris choosing Governor Tim Walz as her running mate. Law expert Harry Litman delves into Jenna Ellis's cooperation with the prosecution, breaking down its legal significance. The discussion also touches on the evolving political landscape and the challenges of connecting with rural voters while underscoring public health and social justice issues.

Former deputy assistant attorney general Harry Litman joins the show to discuss the Supreme Court's immunity ruling complicating legal cases against Trump. Topics include reactions to the decision and its impact on Trump's ongoing legal battles.

Longtime political reporter Dan Balz and legal expert Harry Litman discuss the Trump trial verdict, potential legal repercussions, and the evolving political landscape. Topics include Trump's future, Biden's strengths and weaknesses, and the state of the Presidential race.

Harry Litman, legal expert, discusses the intense closing arguments in Trump's hush money trial. DNC plans virtual roll call for Biden. Severe storms kill dozens in US. Pentagon to repair pier for Gaza aid. Exciting and informative podcast episode!