

Affirmative Action, Gay Rights, and Free Speech: What The Supreme Court's Rulings Mean for America
15 snips Jul 7, 2023
Harry Litman, an attorney and former Supreme Court clerk, Jeannie Suk Gersen, a Harvard Law professor, and Sarah Isgur, a columnist and former Justice Department spokeswoman, explore recent Supreme Court rulings. They discuss the controversial end of affirmative action in college admissions and a decision allowing discrimination against same-sex couples under the guise of free speech. The conversation raises critical questions about civil rights, the Constitution's interpretation, and the widening political divide in America.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Harvard's Discrimination Against Asians
- Jeannie Suk Gersen observed Harvard's discriminatory practices against Asian Americans during the affirmative action trial.
- She noted discrepancies in recruitment letters and overall ratings, despite Asians excelling in other areas.
Two Claims in One
- The debate around affirmative action confounds two distinct claims: discrimination against Asian Americans and the policy's overall fairness.
- Jeannie Suk Gersen argues these are separate issues; Asians can face discrimination while supporting affirmative action.
Unintended Consequences
- Jeannie Suk Gersen suggests the affirmative action ruling could worsen the situation for Asian American applicants.
- Eliminating race as a factor might force schools to de-emphasize criteria where Asians excel, like standardized tests.