David Kelley

David Kelley, the visionary founder of IDEO and Stanford's d.school, shares his journey through design innovation. He reveals fascinating stories, like the creation of Apple's first computer mouse and the principles behind the squishy toothbrush handle. Kelley discusses how diverse teams spark creativity and why design thinking is vital for corporate culture and innovation. He also emphasizes the importance of collaboration, flexibility in workplace dynamics, and the potential for design thinking to transform even nonprofit sectors.

Guest, David Kelley, co-founder of IDEO and Stanford Professor, discusses the importance of asking big questions in problem-solving. They explore the evolving role of design and the integration of different disciplines. The power of asking big questions is emphasized, along with breaking them down into smaller pieces. The guest also highlights the importance of creative confidence and self-efficacy in solving big problems.

Donald Trump clashes with judge in civil fraud trial. Judge criticizes Trump's behavior on the stand. Ivanka Trump set to testify. Potential consequences and impact of witness testimony analyzed. Discussion on abortion initiatives and reproductive rights. Importance of free speech, safeguarding sources, and role of free press.

Eugene Robinson, David Kelley, and Joyce Vance join Ari Melber to discuss Donald Trump's March 2024 trial and Mark Meadows' indictment in the Georgia Rico case. They also talk about defense claims, executive privilege, and a hate crime investigation in Jacksonville.

Legal experts discuss Donald Trump's indictment in the Georgia election probe, focusing on the broad racketeering indictment and its implications. They delve into the strong evidence against the defendants, the power of Rico law, the complexities of the Georgia Rico statute, legal challenges faced by prominent figures, and the impact of the January 6th Committee. They also explore the indictment of Mark Meadows and the role of facts in different outcomes, while discussing the impact of evidence on jurors.