
Dan Williams
Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sussex. He writes the Conspicuous Cognition newsletter, which examines the forces shaping contemporary society and politics.
Top 3 podcasts with Dan Williams
Ranked by the Snipd community

16 snips
Jul 19, 2025 • 46min
Dan Williams on Misinformation
Dan Williams, an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sussex and author of the Conspicuous Cognition newsletter, dives into the nuances of misinformation. He talks about the overly broad definitions that plague public discourse and examines how bias affects our perception of fake news. The conversation also addresses the impact of media narratives on climate change and the societal pressures that stifle critical thinking in journalism and science. Williams emphasizes the need for clarity in political discussions to combat polarization and foster trust.

13 snips
Oct 26, 2024 • 1h 49min
#80 – Dan Williams on How Persuasion Works
Dan Williams, a philosopher at the University of Sussex and associate fellow at the University of Cambridge, dives into the intricacies of belief formation and misinformation. He discusses why reasoning often fails us and likens bad ideas to ‘mind viruses.’ The conversation explores the concept of luxury beliefs as social signals and debates if AI will enhance belief accuracy or deepen misinformation. Williams also examines the effectiveness of fact-checking and the complexities of navigating a polarized marketplace of ideas, emphasizing the challenges in changing entrenched beliefs.

Feb 28, 2025 • 57min
#1065 Daniel Williams: Is the Science of Misinformation Reliable?
Daniel Williams, a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sussex, dives deep into the intricate world of misinformation. He explores its role as a symptom of societal issues, challenging the idea that it's simply a result of external campaigns. The conversation scrutinizes who is responsible for combating misleading information and addresses the rising influence of AI in this landscape. Williams also evaluates the efficacy of fact-checkers, revealing the complexities behind their impact on public understanding.