The Dissenter

#1065 Daniel Williams: Is the Science of Misinformation Reliable?

Feb 28, 2025
Daniel Williams, a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sussex, dives deep into the intricate world of misinformation. He explores its role as a symptom of societal issues, challenging the idea that it's simply a result of external campaigns. The conversation scrutinizes who is responsible for combating misleading information and addresses the rising influence of AI in this landscape. Williams also evaluates the efficacy of fact-checkers, revealing the complexities behind their impact on public understanding.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Defining Misinformation

  • Misinformation studies struggle to define "misinformation" effectively.
  • "Demonstrably false" information is often not misleading, while truly misleading content is rarely "demonstrably false".
INSIGHT

Fake News Prevalence

  • Fake news is less prevalent than assumed, comprising a tiny fraction of media diets.
  • Most people get news from mainstream sources, which rarely publish fake news.
INSIGHT

Misinformation as a Symptom

  • Misinformation is often a symptom of deeper problems, not the root cause.
  • These include distrust of institutions, conspiratorial thinking, and hyper-partisanship.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app