Quantitative futurist Amy Webb discusses the 'super cycle' of AI, wearable devices, and biotechnology, emphasizing the need for future planning. Topics include human responses to modern challenges, data-driven models for predicting trends, potential career paths in the tech landscape, ethical concerns in AI development, and incentivizing ethical choices in technology.

In this discussion, Amy Webb, founder and CEO of the Future Today Institute, sheds light on the coming technology supercycle that will reshape industries. She emphasizes the crucial role of strategic foresight in business decision-making. Webb explores how converging technologies like AI and biotech will drive productivity and sustainability. She also highlights the intersection of technology and personal performance through sensor tech's impact on fitness. Lastly, she addresses the challenges of communicating complex ideas to leaders resistant to change.

Futurist Amy Webb launches the 2024 Tech Trends Report, discussing AI advancements, societal impact, and future scenarios. Topics include brain wave to text conversion, AI bias, and innovative devices like Rabbit 1. She explores AI integration in daily life, sensor technology in face computers, and the challenges of semiconductor chip shortages.

Quantitative futurist Amy Webb explores the plausible outcomes for AI and work. She discusses the role of a futurist in identifying trends and uncertainties, the present and potential of AI, using a time cone as a futurist thinking framework, creating AI abundance with the Adam framework, and introduces herself as a competitive cyclist and preacher.

Quantitative futurist Amy Webb discusses the impact of AI, wearables, and biotech on our future. She emphasizes the need for serious future planning amidst rapid technological changes. Topics include data literacy, AI ethics, and navigating the uncertainties of the evolving technological landscape.

Processed food is bad for you, right? Well, there’s more to this story. As new technologies create foods that can’t be made in home kitchens, such as plant-based meats and dairy products made with plant proteins, the question of whether we should all be consuming more highly processed foods is up for debate. Advocates say a substantial increase in food processing is the best way to feed growing human populations while also reducing food waste. We should trust – and invest – in food technology that can make our global food supply healthier and more sustainable, including highly or ultra-processed foods. Opponents argue that these kinds of foods are often less nutritious, and are commonly linked to adverse health indices, particularly when it comes to ultra-processing. As this debate blooms, Intelligence Squared partners with the Institute of Food Technologists to debate this question: Should We Eat More Processed Foods?  Arguing in favor of the motion is Amy Webb and Michael Gibney. Arguing against the motion is Kevin Hall and Marion Nestle. Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Amy Webb (@amywebb) is an author and the founder and CEO of The Future Today Institute -- a leading foresight and strategy firm that helps leaders and their organizations prepare for complex futures. Her latest book is The Genesis Machine: Our Quest to Rewrite Life in the Age of Synthetic Biology. What We Discuss with Amy Webb: Synthetic biology will change the world in three key areas: medicine, food, and the environment. How pandemics might be wiped out by engineering immunity to deadly diseases on demand before they have a chance to take hold. (Alternatively, how pandemics might be created by engineering new diseases against which we have no defense.) Forget waiting your turn on the donor list: we'll be able to print new vital, life-sustaining organs from scratch instead of relying on unpredictable supply. When we have the ability to resurrect extinct species, will we possess the wisdom to prudently decide what lives again and what stays dead forever? How meat can be grown from cells in labs without slaughtering animals and consuming the resources necessary to sustain them. And much more... Full show notes and resources can be found here: jordanharbinger.com/687 Sign up for Six-Minute Networking -- our free networking and relationship development mini course -- at jordanharbinger.com/course! Like this show? Please leave us a review here -- even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally!

A genetic disease runs in your family. Your doctor tells you that, should you wish to have a child, that child is likely to also carry the disease. But a new gene-editing technology could change your fate. It could ensure that your baby is -- and remains -- healthy. What do you do? It’s is not without its perils. Critics say the technology will exacerbate inequality, pressure all parents (and nations) into editing their children to stay competitive, and meddle with the most basic aspect of our humanity. So, should we use gene editing to make better babies?  Arguing in favor of the motion is geneticist George Church and futurist Amy Webb. Arguing against the motion is policy advocate Marcy Darnovsky and philosopher Françoise Baylis. Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Im Gespräch mit Claudia Nemat teilt die Zukunftsforscherin Amy Webb ihre Einsichten zur Rolle von KI in der deutschen Wirtschaft. Sie beleuchtet die stagnierende Innovationskultur und die Herausforderungen deutscher Unternehmen im Umgang mit Künstlicher Intelligenz. Beide diskutieren, wie aus der ‚German Angst‘ ein neues ‚German Selbstvertrauen‘ entstehen kann. Webb spricht auch über strategische Investitionen in KI und die Wichtigkeit menschlichen Denkens in der Zusammenarbeit mit KI-Technologien.

Processed food is bad for you, right? Well, there’s more to this story. As new technologies create foods that can’t be made in home kitchens, such as plant-based meats and dairy products made with plant proteins, the question of whether we should all be consuming more highly processed foods is up for debate. Advocates say a substantial increase in food processing is the best way to feed growing human populations while also reducing food waste. We should trust – and invest – in food technology that can make our global food supply healthier and more sustainable, including highly or ultra-processed foods. Opponents argue that these kinds of foods are often less nutritious, and are commonly linked to adverse health indices, particularly when it comes to ultra-processing. As this debate blooms, Intelligence Squared partners with the Institute of Food Technologists to debate this question: Should We Eat More Processed Foods?  Arguing in favor of the motion is Amy Webb and Michael Gibney. Arguing against the motion is Kevin Hall and Marion Nestle. Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices