In this discussion, Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, unpacks a pivotal case concerning transgender minors' rights. He analyzes the Supreme Court's deliberation over a Tennessee law banning certain medical treatments, emphasizing the legal and ethical dilemmas involved. Liptak shares insights on the justices' questioning, the potential ramifications for transgender rights, and how this case reflects broader societal debates. It's a deep dive into the intersection of law, healthcare, and the lives of transgender youth.

Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak discusses the recent ruling granting Trump broad immunity, weakening federal cases and expanding presidential power. The decision raises questions about accountability, presidential conduct, and implications for future prosecutions.

Since 1996, the modern internet has been defined by a sweeping law that prevents tech companies such as Facebook and Google from being held responsible for the content posted on their sites.This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could take that legal immunity away.Guest: Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times.Background reading: The decision on website immunity has the potential to alter the very structure of the internet.Lawmakers are targeting big tech “amplification.” What does that mean?For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court overturned decades of precedent by striking down affirmative action and declaring that the race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina were unlawful.Adam Liptak, who covers the United States Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains the ruling, and what it means for American society.Guest: Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The New York Times.Background reading: The Supreme Court’s vote to reject affirmative action programs was 6 to 3, with the liberal justices in dissent.In 2016, in its last major case on affirmative action in higher education, the Supreme Court upheld an aspect of an idiosyncratic admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, Adam Liptak, discusses Trump's claim for immunity from prosecution. They explore the implications of presidential immunity, the skepticism from judges, and the government's case on the immunity of a sitting president. The podcast also analyzes the current court case involving Trump, his legal strategy, and the allegations in the Georgia election interference case.

Adam Liptak from The New York Times discusses the impactful Supreme Court rulings on gun laws, abortion rights, and federal agency power. The Court's rightward shift and potential consequences of overruling the Chevron framework are analyzed, highlighting the far-reaching implications on American society.

Adam Liptak, Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times, discusses the upcoming term and major cases, including gun rights, abortion, and government power. The podcast explores conservative challenges to the Chevron Doctrine, originalism and historical analogies, and an important abortion case related to FDA approval of Miffipristone. It also mentions ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.

In August, President Biden announced a loan cancellation plan that would erase an astonishing $400 billion in student debt — one of the most ambitious and expensive executive actions ever.Now, in a far-reaching case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the president is authorized to take such a big step.Guest: Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.Background reading: The student loan case could redefine the limits of presidential power.Here’s how the arguments at the Supreme Court played out and what to expect in the coming days.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Adam Liptak, who covers the United States Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains why the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is barred from office under the 14th Amendment and discusses the potential implications for the election. The episode explores the legal case regarding Trump's eligibility for the presidency and the polarized electorate's reaction to the ballot controversy.

Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court reporter, discusses a critical gun case argued before the Supreme Court that may limit gun ownership for individuals with domestic violence restraining orders. The episode explores the establishment of a new standard for judging gun control measures, the interpretation of the Second Amendment, and the potential impact of the court's ruling on future gun laws.