Supreme Court Hands Trump Even More Power

The Supreme Court's ruling dramatically limits the power of lower federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions that block presidential policies, notably affecting President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the conservative majority, argued that such broad injunctions are a modern invention without historical precedent, asserting that a single judge should not have the sweeping authority to halt policies nationwide.

This decision significantly boosts executive power by restricting judicial checks on presidential actions, intensifying a clash between the White House and lower courts that have frequently challenged Trump's policies. The dissenting justices, particularly Justice Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, warned this sets a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing the executive branch to violate constitutional rights without effective legal remedies except through costly and complex individual lawsuits.

As a result, the ruling shifts the balance of power towards the presidency while raising concerns about protecting democratic rights and the rule of law, especially amid Trump's aggressive use of executive orders.

• The Supreme Court ruling significantly limits lower courts' power to block presidential policies nationwide.
• This shift greatly enhances the president's ability to pursue an aggressive agenda unchecked by many federal judges.

• Justice Barrett argued nationwide injunctions lack historical grounding and are a modern judicial overreach.
• The ruling emphasizes traditional court powers and rejects broad injunctions that affect everyone universally.