The Daily The Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action
50 snips
Jun 30, 2023 
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the landmark ruling that invalidates affirmative action in college admissions. He explains how the decision impacts race-conscious policies and the complexities facing admissions officers. The conversation highlights dissenting views, particularly from Justice Sotomayor, on the necessity of recognizing historical injustices. Liptak also discusses the potential ramifications for racial diversity and representation in education and society, reflecting on public sentiment and future implications.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Justification for Affirmative Action
- Affirmative action in higher education wasn't initially about righting past wrongs.
- The Supreme Court later justified it based on educational diversity, benefiting all students.
Roberts' Critique of Diversity
- Chief Justice Roberts argues that educational diversity is commendable but unmeasurable.
- This makes it an insufficient justification for affirmative action under judicial scrutiny.
Admissions Process Changes
- Colleges can't use checkboxes for race in admissions.
- They can consider how race shaped an applicant's life if discussed in essays.