Unbelievable? Classic: Intelligent Design on Trial – 15 Years After Kitzmiller-Dover - Mike Behe v Joshua Swamidass
Apr 8, 2025
In this riveting discussion, biochemist Mike Behe and biologist Joshua Swamidass dive into the aftermath of the Kitzmiller-Dover trial. Behe, a leading intelligent design advocate, reflects on the trial's long-term effects, while Swamidass offers a critical perspective on the theory of intelligent design. They tackle the concept of irreducible complexity, comparing biology to engineering, and explore the intersection of faith and science. Their respectful debate highlights the ongoing tension between evolution and design, making for a thought-provoking conversation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Behe's Dover Trial Experience
- Michael Behe explained his experience as a key witness in the Dover trial defending intelligent design.
- The trial unexpectedly turned into a 40-day media circus with global journalist attention.
Judge's Opinion Heavily Influenced
- The judge in the Dover trial heavily relied on documents prepared by evolution proponents for his ruling.
- This led Behe to conclude the judge lacked understanding of the scientific arguments presented.
Advocating ID Discussion in Schools
- Behe supports discussing intelligent design in schools alongside evolution as a legitimate scientific perspective.
- He highlights gaps in current evolutionary theory as reasons for openness to alternative ideas.
