Trump & Tariffs: Why a '19th-century tool' is driving the 2024 campaign
Oct 4, 2024
auto_awesome
Scott Lincicome, Vice President of General Economics at the Cato Institute, dives deep into the complexities of U.S. tariff policies and their economic impact. He explores how import taxes shape the narratives of the 2024 campaign, particularly through the lens of Trump and Harris's differing approaches. The conversation tackles the misconceptions surrounding tariffs, their role in national security debates, and their implications for small businesses in the gig economy. Lincicome emphasizes the urgent need for Congress to reassess and engage in economic policy-making for a fairer trade landscape.
The Biden-Harris administration has expanded Tariffs initially set by Trump, leading to critical economic implications and heightened political debate.
Studies show that tariffs predominantly impact American consumers and businesses, countering the misconception that foreign exporters bear most of the costs.
Calls for comprehensive reform in tariff regulation suggest that Congress should enforce stricter criteria to enhance accountability and transparency in trade policy.
Deep dives
The Resurgence of Tariffs in US Trade Policy
The resurgence of tariffs under the Biden-Harris administration has raised significant concerns about their economic implications. The administration has maintained and even expanded many of the tariffs implemented by former President Trump, leading to renewed discussions on U.S. tax and trade policy. Economists are alarmed at the potential negative impact on the economy, as tariffs are commonly viewed as tools that could disrupt trade relationships and negatively affect domestic prices. The discussion exemplifies a broader trend where tariffs, once thought to be sidelined except for national security purposes, have emerged again as central to political discourse.
Misconceptions About Tariffs and their Impact
One major misconception discussed is the belief that tariffs are primarily paid by foreign exporters rather than American consumers. In reality, studies indicate that approximately 95% of the costs associated with tariffs are shouldered by American companies and consumers due to increased import prices. This raises the question of how tariffs benefit domestic manufacturing, as higher input costs can ultimately decrease production, hurt hiring, and stifle investment in U.S. industries. The conversation draws attention to the complex nature of trade costs and the unintended consequences tariffs have on the economy.
Competition and Retaliation in Global Trade
The discussion highlights the broader ramifications of tariffs on international competition and potential retaliation from other countries. When the U.S. imposes tariffs, it creates a cycle where other nations may respond with their tariffs, negatively affecting American exports. This retaliatory behavior has historically led to decreased trade and economic losses for the domestic manufacturing sector. Moreover, various countries, including China and Canada, have expressed opposition to U.S. tariffs, which has resulted in diminished market access for American goods abroad.
National Security Arguments in Tariff Policies
The use of national security as a justification for tariffs has raised eyebrows, especially considering the lack of concrete evidence supporting many of these claims. While there are instances where tariffs related to national security are justified, such as with defense-related materials, many apply broadly to imports that do not pose a real threat. Critics argue that this vague use of national security undermines the true intent of tariffs and opens the door for potential corruption and cronyism within government policies. The substantial latitude given to the executive branch regarding tariffs without sufficient oversight has further fueled concerns about accountability.
The Need for Comprehensive Policy Reform
In response to the complexities surrounding tariffs and their impact on national and economic security, there have been calls for comprehensive policy reform in how tariffs are regulated. Proposals suggest that Congress should reclaim some of its powers by establishing stricter criteria for imposing tariffs and requiring legislative approval for certain trade measures. This could help create a more accountable and transparent process that minimizes the risks associated with unilateral tariff actions by a sitting president. Encouraging better practices for trade policy could assist citizens and businesses in understanding and navigating the complexities of an increasingly global economy.
Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute, joins Chuck to analyze the stances of former President Trump and Vice President Harris on tariff policy, as trade and import taxes take center stage in the campaign dialogue.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode