Scott Lincicome, a senior lecturer at Duke University and trade policy expert at Cato, dives into the complex world of tariffs and their implications. He discusses the potential economic repercussions of a second Trump administration, exploring how tariffs affect consumers and industries. Lincicome highlights the importance of reclaiming congressional authority over trade decisions and critiques protectionist policies. The conversation also touches on the evolving landscape of Republican trade philosophy and even includes some playful commentary on the WNBA.

In this engaging discussion, Mustafa Akyol, an expert on Islam and liberal democracy, and Doug Bandow, a foreign policy fellow, explore the shared values between Jewish and Muslim communities. Brian Blankenship sheds light on NATO’s burden-sharing dilemmas. Robert R. Redfield and Ryan Bourne critique the pandemic response and its economic fallout. Emily Ekins, Scott Lincicome, and Caleb O. Brown tackle American misunderstandings of protectionism. Lastly, Gene Healy discusses evolving views on presidential power and accountability.

Scott Lincicome, Vice President of General Economics at the Cato Institute, dives deep into the complexities of U.S. tariff policies and their economic impact. He explores how import taxes shape the narratives of the 2024 campaign, particularly through the lens of Trump and Harris's differing approaches. The conversation tackles the misconceptions surrounding tariffs, their role in national security debates, and their implications for small businesses in the gig economy. Lincicome emphasizes the urgent need for Congress to reassess and engage in economic policy-making for a fairer trade landscape.

Scott Lincicome, Vice President of general economics at the Cato Institute, dives into the complexities of U.S. tariff policies shaped by recent administrations. He argues that high protective tariffs have failed to deliver promised economic benefits. The discussion reveals how presidential power has expanded, limiting Congress's role in trade decisions. Lincicome also highlights the economic burdens on consumers due to these tariffs and raises concerns about future policies under potential future leaders, emphasizing the need for reform in tariff authority.

Scott Lincicome, Vice President of General Economics at the Cato Institute, dives into the complexities of tariffs and trade policy. He critiques the political rhetoric from figures like Trump and Harris, arguing that tariffs often burden consumers more than intended. The conversation highlights the CHIPS and Science Act's aims to boost U.S. manufacturing while pointing out the inefficacy of broad tariffs that stifle innovation. Lincicome also explores how tariffs intertwine with immigration policies, emphasizing the importance of immigrant workers for economic growth.

Scott Lincicome, Vice President of the Cato Institute and a trade policy expert, joins to unravel the complexities of tariffs and free market principles. He critiques 19th-century tariff comparisons in today’s global landscape and addresses the hypocrisy within the Republican party regarding tariff support. They explore the ramifications of Trump’s economic strategies, supply chain adjustments, and the disconnect between economists and politicians. Plus, a humorous look at Marvel's trade tariffs offers a lighter twist to the conversation about economic policies.

Scott Lincicome, an economist and Vice President of General Economics at the Cato Institute, joins to tackle the complexities of economic policies under Trump and Harris. He critiques how economic news is reported, highlighting common misconceptions. The rise of economic populism is dissected, revealing its influence on policies and voter sentiments. They also examine proposals like eliminating taxes on tips and assess the financial burden of tariffs on consumers. Additionally, Lincicome discusses the intricate role of executive power in shaping immigration and economic policy.

Scott Lincicome, an expert on economic policies in grocery operations, delves into Kamala Harris's plan to combat corporate price gouging. He questions the practicality of the proposal, highlighting a disconnect between policy intentions and grocery market realities. The discussion covers why concerns about price gouging may be overstated as grocery inflation declines. Lincicome warns of the unintended consequences of price controls, emphasizing how government actions can lead to reduced availability and increased prices, reflecting the perils of populism in economic policy.

Scott Lincicome, a trade policy expert, and Emily Ekins, a public opinion researcher, dive into new polling data revealing how Americans view protectionism. They discuss the conflict between supporting 'Buy American' initiatives and the potential costs consumers face. Lincicome and Ekins highlight a significant disconnect between public anxiety over inflation and the allure of tariffs. The conversation sheds light on how education can reshape perceptions about trade, creating an intriguing dynamic in the ongoing debate over economic policies.

Scott Lincicome, a trade policy expert, dives into the trade positions of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. He argues that both leaders lean towards protectionism, using tariffs as political tools rather than champions of free trade. Lincicome also discusses the impact of Trump's exit from international trade agreements and the uncertainty surrounding future trade policies under a Harris administration. Despite political headwinds and challenges, he highlights the surprising resilience of global trade and individual interactions driving economic connections.