Strict Scrutiny

Smashing Precedents and Making Up Facts

Jul 4, 2022
Ask episode
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1
Introduction
00:00 • 5min
2
McGirt v. Oklahoma State
05:01 • 2min
3
Oklahoma Supreme Court Decision in McGirt - Is Oklahoma Criminal Jurisdiction?
07:18 • 2min
4
How Much Time Do We Have?
09:21 • 3min
5
The Equal Footing Doctrine in Federal Indian Law
12:46 • 2min
6
Gorsuch's Dissent Is a Remarkable Opinion
14:19 • 2min
7
Federal Indian Law
16:07 • 2min
8
The History After Worcester Is Like So Much of the History
18:34 • 4min
9
Do the Background Principles Really Work?
22:23 • 3min
10
The Supreme Court's View on Tribal Sovereignty
25:39 • 2min
11
What Do You Think of Justice Barrett's Vote in Burkine?
27:43 • 5min
12
Apostrophe - Get Your First Dermatologist Crafted Treatment Plan for $5
32:54 • 3min
13
The Dissenting Opinion on the Brownington High School Football Coach's Prayers
35:38 • 3min
14
Is This a Next Frontier in Justice Gorsuch's Judgment?
39:03 • 4min
15
The Court's New Test Is Lemon and Endorsement
43:25 • 5min
16
Blinkist Review
48:50 • 5min
17
The First Step Act v. United States
54:04 • 2min
18
First Step Back - Torres v Texas Department of Public Safety
56:22 • 3min
19
Biden vs Texas - Is This Really a New Policy?
59:09 • 4min
20
The Supreme Court's Opinion in Shin vs Martinez Ramirez
01:03:38 • 5min
21
Voting Rights Act - Strict Scrutiny Is a Crooked Media Production
01:08:46 • 3min