Business Wars

Diamond Wars | Monopolies Aren’t Forever | 6

Jul 13, 2020
In the late 1990s, the dark truth of blood diamonds surfaces as rebel armies fund terror with these gems. De Beers faces growing scrutiny, prompting a pivotal shift towards ethical branding. The tension at a 1996 Mumbai conference highlights industry fears over falling prices and De Beers' dominance. A glamorous London launch in 2002 reveals the stakes involved with high-value diamonds, while the mid-2000s usher in a wave of competition and new threats, including the impact of the Blood Diamond film and synthetic alternatives.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

De Beers' Retaliation

  • De Beers punished Argyle for leaving its cartel by flooding the market with similar diamonds, crashing prices.
  • This tactic squeezed Indian manufacturers who relied on Argyle's stones.
INSIGHT

De Beers' Weakening Grip

  • Despite controlling the diamond market for over a century, De Beers' grip is weakening.
  • The company questions if maintaining its monopoly is worthwhile.
ANECDOTE

Blood Diamond Trade

  • An arms dealer named Adrian trades weapons for blood diamonds with Unita in Angola.
  • He then sells these diamonds in Antwerp, where they are mixed with legitimate stones, making them untraceable.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app