The Daily The Supreme Court vs. Andy Warhol
6 snips
May 23, 2023 
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, dives into a significant case centering on artist Andy Warhol's use of a photo of Prince. The discussion navigates the fine line between artistic inspiration and copyright theft. Liptak explores how this ruling could redefine the landscape of contemporary art and its implications for creative expression. Through the lens of legal battles, he highlights the ongoing debates around fair use and the rights of original artists versus iconic reinterpretations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Origins of the Case
- Lynn Goldsmith photographed Prince in 1981, capturing a vulnerable image.
- Andy Warhol later adapted this photo for Vanity Fair, creating a distinct interpretation of celebrity.
Warhol's Prince Series & Goldsmith's Claim
- Warhol created 16 works based on Goldsmith's photo, which became part of the Warhol Foundation after his death.
- In 2016, Vanity Fair used one, prompting Goldsmith's copyright claim.
Warhol Foundation's Stance
- The Warhol Foundation sued, aiming to establish broader fair use rights for artists.
- They argued Warhol's work transformed Goldsmith's, creating new meaning and message.