Nicos Poulantzas, an influential Marxist theorist, dives into the complexities of the state and capitalism. He critiques traditional views of the state as neutral, emphasizing its deep ties to capitalism. The discussion navigates Poulantzas' conflict with Foucault's power dynamics and the pitfalls of economic reductionism. They also tackle the nuances of far-right politics and the role of class struggle in shaping history. The conversation offers a fresh look at state power, urging a deeper understanding essential for effective political action.
Poulantzas critiques traditional Marxist views by asserting that the capitalist state is deeply intertwined with societal structures and economic production.
The state plays a complex role in governance, shaping societal values and identities through material practices beyond mere coercion or ideology.
Poulantzas emphasizes that understanding political action requires recognizing the state as a result of class struggles, not merely a tool for the ruling class.
Deep dives
Understanding Polanyi's Political Theory
The podcast delves into Nikos Polanyi's political theory, which critiques traditional Marxist perspectives regarding the nature of the capitalist state. Polanyi argues against the instrumentalist conception of the state, which views it as a separate entity that can be merely seized by a ruling class to serve its interests. Instead, he posits that the capitalist state is deeply integrated within society, shaping economic production and social relations. This perspective provides a nuanced understanding of power dynamics, emphasizing that the state cannot simply be manipulated for emancipatory purposes without recognizing its inherent roles in maintaining capitalist social structures.
The State as an Integrated Apparatus
Polanyi's theory highlights the capitalist state as an essential component of the totality of social relations rather than an isolated authority. He argues that economic production is shaped by the state and vice versa, indicating that one cannot exist without the other. This interdependence means that the state plays a crucial part in structuring social interactions and individual behaviors, formatting them to support capitalist structures. By framing the state in this manner, Polanyi suggests that traditional Marxist strategies to 'seize' state power overlook the complexities of how the state influences the economic fabric and everyday life.
Beyond Repression and Ideology
The podcast discusses Polanyi's assertion that the state's apparatuses extend beyond simple functions of repression and ideology, suggesting a more complex role in societal governance. He argues that state practices foster mass consensus through material practices that are neither purely coercive nor merely ideological. For example, state-funded social programs like social security serve to create social stability rather than solely to perpetuate ruling class power. This broader view encourages an examination of various ways state mechanisms shape societal values and identities, moving beyond a binary understanding of state functions.
Class Struggle and the Nature of the State
The conversation emphasizes Polanyi's belief that the state is a product of class struggles rather than a static instrument of ruling class domination. He asserts that the balance of power among various class interests can lead the state to adopt functions that accommodate broader social demands and avoid direct conflict. This perspective challenges the notion that the state is singularly or exclusively operating in favor of capitalist interests, underscoring the importance of historical and social contexts in understanding state behavior. By situating the state within the dynamics of class conflict, Polanyi invites a more comprehensive analysis of its role in social organization.
The Implications for Political Action
Polanyi's insights raise critical questions about the nature of political action and the efficacy of simply attempting to seize state power. The discussion suggests that political movements grounded in a misunderstanding of the state may lead to ineffective or counterproductive strategies. Polanyi's emphasis on intricate class interactions and the limitations of treating the state as a mere tool for revolutionary ends highlights the necessity for a more sophisticated political theory. This approach encourages activists and theorists alike to critically assess the state's role in societal change and consider how collective struggles can engage with this complexity.
In this episode we take up the question: what is the State? With 1978’s State, Power, Socialism by Nicos Poulantzas as our guide, we talk about what it means to grasp the state as a historically specific form inseparable from the economy, find ourselves torn between the mutual dissatisfactions of Althusser and Foucault, and ask whether it is even possible to conceptualize ‘the capitalist state’ as such. Doing so might be necessary for political strategic reasons, but O, abstraction! Along the way we give some of our favorite French thinkers a bit of a hard time. It’s meant with love. Mostly.
patreon.com/leftofphilosophy
References:
Nicos Poulantzas, State, Power, Socialism, trans. Patrick Camiller, with an introduction by Stuart Hall (New York: Verso, 2014)
Music:
“Vintage Memories” by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com
“My Space” by Overu | https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode