AnnaLee Saxenian's 'Regional Advantage' offers a comparative analysis of two prominent tech regions: Silicon Valley and Route 128 near Boston. She investigates how their contrasting organizational structures and cultures influenced their economic trajectories. Silicon Valley's decentralized, collaborative environment fostered innovation and adaptability. Route 128's hierarchical, vertically integrated firms struggled to keep pace with rapid technological change. The book highlights the importance of regional networks, knowledge sharing, and entrepreneurial ecosystems in driving economic success. Saxenian's work has become a seminal contribution to understanding the dynamics of regional economies and the role of culture in shaping innovation.
The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America provides a detailed and nuanced account of Silicon Valley's rise, emphasizing the significant role of government support and funding alongside the contributions of pioneering entrepreneurs. Margaret O'Mara chronicles the region's history from the post-war period, through the Cold War and the space race, to the modern era of big tech. The book exposes the myth of Silicon Valley's self-reliance, instead revealing a complex interplay between public and private sectors. It also addresses issues such as gender imbalance, casual misogyny, and the broader social and political implications of Silicon Valley's growth. O'Mara's narrative includes insights from key figures, both famous and lesser-known, and explores the financial, political, and cultural dynamics that have shaped the Valley[1][3][5].
You know what they say — Silicon Valley wasn’t built in a day, nor was it built by just a small group of tech gurus. In fact, the origin story of the Valley is a complex story involving government, industry, and academia.
Margaret O’Mara is a history professor at the University of Washington. Her latest book, The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America gives an in-depth, behind-the-scenes look at the making of the tech empire, and how it’s grown into an economic engine.
Margaret and Greg discuss the significant role the government played in the early days of Silicon Valley, key historical figures in the region’s rise to prominence and factors that set it apart from other tech hubs like Boston, and how the ecosystem has evolved alongside politics, technology, and cultural shifts.
*unSILOed Podcast is produced by University FM.*
Episode Quotes:
How storytelling built Silicon Valley’s legacy
31:59: I think there's the story of the products, and then there's the story of the place, the story of the guys in garages. The story of this entrepreneurial genius, and that's a great, great story. It's part of the story. It leaves out this bigger landscape of government and society and people who are non-technical people, the Regis McKenna’s of the world, who are so instrumental in making all this happen. But it's—I mean, I know as a historian—storytelling is powerful. That's how you help people understand and relate. And so Silicon Valley has been such a good storyteller.
Why everyone should understand tech history
04:27: It's really important for all of us as users of this technology to have a way to understand it and understand its history. Even if we don't know, even if we aren't programmers ourselves.
Meritocracy alone hasn’t changed the face of power
53:16: We're seeing the people at the very, very top of power and influence are more homogenous than ever, which is showing that this meritocracy, this idea, just doesn't—only goes so far. So understanding the history kind of helps, I think, is really important in kind of getting why. Okay, why has this not changed? Why is this so baked into the model? But it also doesn't mean that we should just throw up our hands and say, well, this is the way it is.
Federal research grants built founders not just labs
11:57: Research money for universities is not only seeding basic research in labs and then seeding spinoff companies and commercializing technologies from those labs, but it's also educating people. When you look, kind of dollar for dollar, about, you know—when you look at Stanford, for example, if you just look at the tech space—I think biotech is different. Medical sciences are different because you have more of that kind of pipeline from lab to startup in that space. But when you're looking at computer hardware and software, it's more about the people that went to Stanford that went on to found companies, right? Everyone from Hewlett and Packard to Brin and Page and everyone in between. That is, it's kind of a people factory, so that's part of it. And that federal money is paying for people for science and engineering programs. So that's a really important component.
Show Links:
Recommended Resources:
Guest Profile:
Guest Work:
unSILOed with Greg LaBlanc 
