

What Dr. Peter Attia Gets Wrong About DNAm Aging Clocks
5 snips Dec 6, 2023
The hosts debunk Dr. Peter Attia's points about the predictive value of aging clocks and offer an updated view. They discuss the evolution of epigenetic clocks and the use of multi-omic markers for disease prediction. The significance of longitudinal data in biologic age testing is explored, along with the benefits of the Dine and Pace method for assessing stress response. Advancements in understanding DNA methylation aging clocks and the importance of using blood tests for accuracy are also discussed.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6
Introduction
00:00 • 2min
Advancements in Epigenetic Aging Clocks
02:00 • 8min
A New Study Challenges Dr. Peter Attia's Perspective on DNAm Aging Clocks
09:57 • 2min
The Significance of Longitudinal Data in Biologic Age Testing
11:39 • 6min
Exploring the Benefits of the Dine and Pace Method for Assessing Physiological Stress Response and Individualized Interventions
17:26 • 2min
Advancements in Understanding DNA Methylation Aging Clocks
19:37 • 26min