Per My Last Email
We React to Corporate Espionage: Rippling v Deel
Mar 24, 2025
Dive into the intriguing layers of the Rippling v Deel corporate espionage case. The hosts share humorous insights on deceptive tactics, like fake Slack channels designed to sabotage competitors. Discussions also tackle the ethical dilemmas of sharing knowledge when switching jobs and the blurred lines of noncompete agreements. Plus, they reveal why having a work nemesis might actually be beneficial for your career. It's a wild ride through the world of corporate rivalries and professionalism!
30:25
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Rippling v Deel lawsuit highlights the ethical dilemmas in corporate competition, emphasizing that competition should not compromise integrity and honesty.
- Rippling's innovative tactics to reveal corporate espionage, including the creation of a fake Slack channel, demonstrate the extreme measures companies may take to protect proprietary information.
Deep dives
Corporate Espionage Case Overview
A significant corporate espionage case involves Rippling, a B2B SaaS company, suing its competitor Deal after it was alleged that an employee from Rippling acted as a spy for Deal. This employee reportedly searched for sensitive information about Deal within Rippling’s systems on average 23 times daily over several months, seeking competitive advantages. Key pieces of data allegedly accessed included potential leads for Rippling’s products and internal notes about customer interactions. Such activities raise concerns about the ethical boundaries of competition in the corporate world and highlight the risks companies face regarding proprietary information.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
