

A Legal Winning Streak for Religion
Apr 14, 2021
Join Adam Liptak, Supreme Court reporter for The New York Times, as he unpacks a recent ruling that lifted California's COVID-19 restrictions on religious services. The discussion dives into whether the Supreme Court is genuinely protecting religious freedoms or is favoring them over other rights. Liptak also highlights a broader trend: the court's increasing inclination to favor religious claims and how this shapes the future of legal neutrality and public health regulations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
California COVID Restrictions Lifted
- The Supreme Court lifted California's COVID restrictions on religious services held in private homes.
- This ruling favors religious freedom over health restrictions.
Winning Streak for Religious Liberty
- This ruling is part of a larger trend of the Supreme Court favoring religious liberty claims.
- This trend undermines the 1990 principle of neutral laws applying to everyone, including religious individuals.
Employment Division v. Smith
- The 1990 principle stems from Employment Division v. Smith, involving Native American peyote use.
- The court ruled that neutral laws of general applicability apply to everyone, regardless of religious objections.