Ep. 227: Zac Robinson | The Best Programming Podcast EVER (part 1)
Dec 8, 2023
auto_awesome
Zac Robinson, owner of Data Driven Strength, talks about understanding proximity to failure, individual response to training, and communicating that information. They also discuss building Data Driven Strength, the influence of content creators, evolution of interests in strength training, proximity to failure, and programming basics and training principles.
Training closer to failure can benefit hypertrophy but does not significantly impact strength gains.
Designing training programs for hypertrophy requires higher volumes, exercises targeted for muscle growth, and training closer to failure within a range of zero to three reps in reserve (RIR).
Deep dives
Proximity to failure and its impact on hypertrophy and strength
Training closer to failure on a per-set basis can benefit hypertrophy, while there is no significant relationship between proximity to failure and strength. For hypertrophy, training closer to failure leads to greater increases in muscle size. However, for strength, proximity to failure does not seem to drive strength adaptations. The paper emphasizes that training closer to failure can be beneficial for hypertrophy but not necessarily for strength, with load and other factors playing a more significant role in strength gains.
Programming considerations for hypertrophy and strength goals
When it comes to designing training programs for hypertrophy, higher volumes and exercises that are specifically targeted for muscle growth are generally recommended. Training closer to failure, within a range of zero to three reps in reserve (RIR), is advised for hypertrophy development. On the other hand, for strength-focused programs, proximity to failure does not appear to have a significant impact on strength gains. Instead, the focus should be on lifting heavier percentages of one-rep max (1-RM) and avoiding fatigue-mediated changes in RIR for sets involving high loads. For power and speed development, training closer to failure may even have a negative effect on adaptations.
Bridging concurrent training with periodization
For those pursuing concurrent training, aiming to improve multiple training adaptations simultaneously, it is crucial to strike a balance between hypertrophy and strength goals. This may involve training closer to failure within a range of two to four RIR for main lifts during the hypertrophy phase, while keeping a moderate amount of RIR for accessory exercises to mitigate fatigue and maintain muscle growth. As the program transitions into the strength phase, focus shifts to maximizing performance on high-load sets, with a priority on lifting heavy loads and minimizing fatigue-mediated changes in RIR. Individualization and context-specific considerations are essential in implementing these principles.
Selective application of training strategies
When writing a training program, it is essential to selectively apply relevant training strategies based on individual goals, background, and competition timeline. This involves incorporating principles such as proximity to failure for hypertrophy, load-focused training for strength, and customization for power development. It requires a careful process of addition and elimination, considering the specific needs of the individual and the desired outcome. This selective approach helps create a focused and effective training program that maximizes performance on the competition day.
This podcast will go down in the history books... I don't think I've recorded such a unique and comprehensive podcast about programming, particularly understanding proximity to failure, individual response to training, and communicating that information to a wider audience.
Enjoy part one of the best damn programming podcast to date.