Advisory Opinions The Arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan
37 snips
Apr 29, 2025 Amy Howe, a reporter for SCOTUSblog and a key voice in legal journalism, joins the discussion alongside David Lat. They dive into the intriguing case of Judge Hannah Dugan's arrest and its implications for judicial accountability. The conversation also explores the potential for cameras in the Supreme Court, weighing transparency against the risks of sensationalism. Additionally, they dissect the complexities of judicial immunity and recent landmark cases impacting employment discrimination, setting the stage for pivotal discussions in the legal landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Cameras Boost Civic Education
- Cameras in the Supreme Court could enhance civic education and transparency by allowing more people to observe proceedings.
- Despite concerns, actual live circuit court recordings show viral moments are rare and the court's elite bar resists spectacle.
Transparency Risks Court's Dignity
- Transparency triggers concerns over spectacle and politicization, likened to Congress's experience with cameras.
- Judicial behavior might change under cameras, risking loss of the court's dignified deliberation.
Rare Use of "Lying" at SCOTUS
- At a Supreme Court argument, Lisa Blatt accused opposing counsel of lying, a rare and serious affront.
- Justice Gorsuch intervened, underscoring the gravity of such accusations in courtroom civility.
