Amy Howe

Amy Howe, a reporter for SCOTUSblog and a key voice in legal journalism, joins the discussion alongside David Lat. They dive into the intriguing case of Judge Hannah Dugan's arrest and its implications for judicial accountability. The conversation also explores the potential for cameras in the Supreme Court, weighing transparency against the risks of sensationalism. Additionally, they dissect the complexities of judicial immunity and recent landmark cases impacting employment discrimination, setting the stage for pivotal discussions in the legal landscape.

Amy Howe, a Supreme Court analyst at SCOTUSblog, and David Lat, a legal commentator and founder of Original Jurisdiction, dive into the heated debate surrounding the St. Isidore of Seville religious charter school case. They discuss the classification of public versus private schools and the implications for educational policy. The conversation also touches on Justice Barrett's recusal and whether Chief Justice Roberts might become the deciding vote. Additionally, they explore the complexities of birthright citizenship and its potential legal ramifications in current cases.

Amy Howe, a Supreme Court journalist, joins legal commentator David Lat and Zachary Shemtob of SCOTUSblog to examine the recent Supreme Court case on birthright citizenship. They discuss the implications of Trump’s executive order and the surprising skepticism from justices about the government's arguments. The trio dives into the complexities of universal injunctions and class actions, revealing how judicial philosophies impact future legal decisions. Expect insights on political dynamics and the unpredictability of the Court's rulings.

Supreme Court reporter Amy Howe discusses the case on presidential immunity for former presidents like Donald Trump. Legal implications, arguments for and against prosecution, and discussions on presidential power and accountability are explored with insights from legal experts.

Amy Howe, an expert on Supreme Court litigation, and Tom Goldstein, a seasoned lawyer known for his constitutional law insights, dive deep into the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade. They dissect the legal ramifications, exploring how such a shift may affect abortion rights across the states. The conversation touches on the implications for judicial precedent, potential constitutional amendments, and the evolving public sentiment surrounding these critical issues. Their discussion highlights the tension between legal decisions and societal values.