Dominic Barton, board chair for Rio Tinto and former Canadian ambassador to China, joins Frithjof Lund, a McKinsey senior partner in corporate governance, and Ziad Haider, a specialist in geopolitical risk. They dive into how boards can navigate complex geopolitical landscapes. The conversation highlights the importance of proactive risk management, creating dedicated units for geopolitical insights, and the evolving roles of non-executive directors. They stress the need for structured frameworks and transparency in addressing uncertainties while aligning board and executive strategies.
Corporate boards must adapt to increased geopolitical risks by engaging more deeply in discussions and dedicating more time to these critical issues.
Developing effective frameworks for understanding geopolitical risks is essential for boards to enhance strategic foresight and organizational resilience.
Deep dives
The Complexity of Geopolitical Risks for Corporate Boards
Corporate boards are increasingly encountering complex geopolitical risks that differ from traditional performance metrics and strategies. This complexity arises from varying views, emotions, and perspectives that influence how these risks are perceived and addressed. As geopolitical matters become more intertwined with business operations, boards must adapt to engage more deeply in these discussions, leading to longer hours dedicated to board activities. The integration of these geopolitical considerations into board agendas reflects a significant change, requiring members to be more informed and proactive.
Time and Engagement Shift on Corporate Boards
The demands placed on board directors have shifted, leading to an increase in time spent on critical issues, including geopolitical risks. Many directors report spending more days per year on board-related activities compared to previous years, indicating a need for a deeper engagement in these complex topics. Additionally, there is a trend toward directors serving on fewer boards to allow for this increased focus, as organizations seek board members who can dedicate time and resources sufficiently. This shift also encourages a reevaluation of board compositions to ensure they have the necessary skills and insights to navigate geopolitical complexities.
Geopolitical Awareness and Strategic Oversight
Despite recognizing the growing significance of geopolitical risks, many boards still struggle to prioritize these issues within their agendas. Surveys indicate that less than half of board members currently view geopolitical risks as a key priority, which may hinder effective oversight and strategic planning. A lack of understanding and structured frameworks for geopolitical matters can lead to implications for organizational resilience and strategic adaptability. Boards must cultivate a heightened awareness and develop competencies to engage meaningfully in geopolitical discussions, recognizing how such risks affect broader organizational objectives.
Frameworks for Better Geopolitical Risk Management
Establishing effective frameworks for understanding and managing geopolitical risks is becoming essential for boards navigating today's global landscape. Organizations are experimenting with various models, including dedicated geopolitical risk units and advisory councils, to provide insights and foster coordinated responses. A comprehensive approach allows boards to identify and prioritize risks, assess their impact, and integrate these considerations into their overall risk management. By organizing discussions around frameworks that encompass multiple dimensions of risk, boards can improve their strategic foresight and resilience amid geopolitical volatility.
Corporate boards face increased complexity today, with heightened geopolitical risk key among the concerns they must consider as they guide the companies they serve. In this episode, three experts on boards and geopolitics discuss how boards can best adapt to this new normal. Dominic Barton is board chair for the metals and mining company Rio Tinto, and also for the impact investment firm Leapfrog investments. He's also a senior advisor and partner at the AI investment firm Radical Ventures. Previously, Dom served as Canada’s ambassador to China. And before that he was a McKinsey senior partner who served as our global managing partner for three terms. Frithjof Lund is a senior partner who leads our Board Services Practice as well as our Norway office. He helps boards of directors improve corporate governance. Ziad Haider is a partner and our global director of geopolitical risk. He is based in our Singapore office, and counsels CXOs and boards on how to build out their capabilities to better understand, monitor, and mitigate geopolitical risk.