Charles Clancy, CTO of MITRE, discusses MITRE's role in national science & tech strategy, China's threat to US infrastructure, cyber workforce gap filled by AI, and the evolution of S&T funding. They delve into polarization, bridging divides with MITRE, empowering mission experts, cybersecurity workforce challenges, and the impact of defense tech unicorns on talent acquisition.
National collaboration is essential for addressing science and technology market failures and prioritizing key areas for innovation.
Historical investments in science and technology have evolved to involve universities and federal programs, emphasizing the need for robust industry-academia collaborations in emerging tech sectors.
Deep dives
MITRE's Role in National Science and Technology Strategy
Addressing critical market failures in promoting science and technology innovation requires a national-level effort involving government, industry, and academic collaboration to address the nation's key priorities. The evolution of the U.S. tech economy highlights historic bets on achievements like the Manhattan Project and Apollo Program, shaping national technology directions. However, the absence of a unifying goal post-Apollo led to market-driven tech development, primarily focusing on areas like software. Globalization shifted low-end manufacturing offshore, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation of U.S. science and technology investments to respond to national security concerns, as reflected in the Chips and Science Act.
20th Century Science and Technology History
Historical national investments in science and technology, like those in biology and the Genome Project, primarily undertaken by industrial monopolies initially with federal support, evolved post-1980s to involve universities and federal programs. Sectors like bio-pharma succeeded in creating symbiotic relationships with universities, facilitating significant R&D investments. The emergence of new technology areas like quantum and semiconductors demands a shift in investment strategies to foster robust industry-academia collaborations and innovation ecosystems engendered by deep tech investors to drive future advancements.
National Investments in Critical and Emerging Technologies
Deliberations on prioritizing ten key technology areas, including AI, quantum, and cybersecurity, reflect the challenge of aligning technology innovation with national security imperatives. While certain sectors like AI witness strong industry support, federal investment is essential for enhancing aspects like AI safety and regulatory frameworks. The Chips and Science Act targets bolstering domestic semiconductor resources but underscores the necessity for sustainable economic models to ensure long-term self-reliance.
Cybersecurity Challenges and National Cyber Initiatives
Discussions on cybersecurity workforce shortages underscore the gap between job demand and available talent, impacting national security readiness. The evolving threat landscape necessitates innovative approaches to address emerging challenges like post-quantum cryptography and cybersecurity resilience. Balancing academic openness with national security concerns, initiatives like NSPM33 aim to regulate research security and collaboration in critical technology areas, seeking to enhance national innovation while safeguarding intellectual assets.
Charles Clancy is the CTO of MITRE, an American not-for-profit organization managing federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) supporting various US government agencies in defense, healthcare, national security, and cybersecurity fields, among others.
In this interview, we discuss:
What is MITRE and how does it support national science & technology strategy
How China threatens America’s infrastructure and university R&D
The cyber workforce gap and how AI could fill it
Finding mission-driven work for highly skilled technologists
How the ecosystem of S&T and R&D funding evolved through the 20th century to today