Chalk & Talk

Balanced literacy didn’t work—will balanced math? with Ben Solomon (Ep 54)

23 snips
Sep 12, 2025
In a compelling discussion, Dr. Ben Solomon, a professor and researcher at the University at Albany, critiques the New York math briefs that are set to shape statewide math instruction. He argues for their retraction, citing misleading claims and a misuse of 'evidence-based' terminology. Solomon debunks common myths, like the idea that timed tests lead to math anxiety, and emphasizes the need for explicit instruction. Drawing parallels to literacy debates, he advocates for structured teaching methods to improve student outcomes in math.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ADVICE

Require Rigorous Evidence For Policy

  • Do demand state guidance cite comprehensive peer-reviewed research when claiming to represent the "science" of math instruction.
  • Ask for systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, and clear evidence summaries rather than opinion pieces.
INSIGHT

Veneer Of Science Masks Pseudoscience

  • The briefs present a veneer of science but lack substance, fitting a pattern of pseudoscience.
  • Superficial use of "science" misleads educators and risks harmful policy adoption.
ADVICE

Use Speeded Practice To Build Fluency

  • Do use brief, speeded practice and timed probes to measure fluency and predict future math success.
  • Avoid blaming short timed tests for math anxiety; instead address weak prior instruction.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app