Advocating for Effective Math Education Reform

This chapter highlights the significance of evidence-based practices in math education, drawing lessons from successful reforms in England. It urges New Yorkers to take action by signing a petition to improve educational policies that enhance student confidence and skills in mathematics.

Transcript

chevron_right

Play full episode

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

In this episode, Anna Stokke speaks with Dr. Ben Solomon, professor and researcher at the University at Albany with expertise in math assessment and intervention. Ben returns to the podcast to discuss “balanced math” and the recently released New York math briefs, which are part of the state’s numeracy initiative, and are set to shape professional development across New York.

He explains why he and his colleagues launched a petition calling for the retraction of the briefs, pointing to omissions, misleading claims, and misuse of the term “evidence based.” They also unpack common math myths, such as the claim that timed tests cause math anxiety, and highlight the importance of explicit instruction while drawing parallels to balanced literacy and the reading wars.

This timely conversation is essential for educators, policymakers, and anyone committed to improving math education.

This episode is also available in video at www.youtube.com/@chalktalk-stokke

Petition to Retract the New York Math Briefs: https://shorturl.at/bN7PF

Masterclass: Evidence-informed Mathematics Teaching, La Trobe University https://shortcourses.latrobe.edu.au/masterclass-evidence-informed-mathematics-teaching

TIMESTAMPS

[00:00:23] Introduction

[00:04:22] Understanding the New York Math Briefs

[00:09:46] The science of learning and its frameworks

[00:16:18] Myth 1: Time Testing causes Math Anxiety

[00:22:00] Myth 2: Explicit Instruction is Only for Students with Disabilities

[00:27:10] What is Explicit Instruction?

[00:29:45] The Importance of Explicit Instruction