PAUL BLOOM: the role of reason in moral judgements
Sep 5, 2024
auto_awesome
Paul Bloom, a Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto and former Yale professor, brings fascinating insights into morality. He discusses how reason plays a crucial role in moral decisions, arguing against relying solely on emotions. The conversation dives into the complexities of moral judgments, revealing children’s inherent sense of morality and the influence of empathy. Bloom also distinguishes between fleeting pleasures and long-term happiness, exploring our emotional attachments to sentimental objects and their psychological significance.
Paul Bloom highlights that infants exhibit innate moral senses, showing preferences for altruism over selfishness, suggesting morality may be hardwired.
Bloom explores the complex interplay between pleasure and pain, illustrating how discomfort can lead to enjoyable experiences like sad films or intense challenges.
In advocating for rationality over empathy in moral judgments, Bloom argues that relying on reason fosters better ethical outcomes and reduces bias.
Deep dives
The Innate Moral Sense of Infants
Research indicates that infants possess an innate moral sense from an early age. Paul Bloom discusses experiments where babies, even as young as six months, show preferences for altruistic behaviors over selfish ones, as demonstrated through puppet shows. This challenges the view that morality is solely a product of cultural learning since these young children exhibit implicit moral judgments before they can articulate them. The findings suggest that elements of morality are likely hardwired and point to similarities in moral reasoning between humans and certain non-human animals.
The Complex Nature of Pleasure and Pain
Bloom explores the intricate relationship between pleasure and pain, particularly in how people seek out experiences that combine both. In his latest book, he examines why individuals might find enjoyment in sad films or intense physical challenges, revealing the nuanced motivations behind such preferences. Understanding the brain's mechanics, which show that areas responsible for pleasure and pain are closely linked, helps explain why some derive satisfaction from experiences that involve discomfort. This intersection highlights how pleasure can sometimes emerge from experiences that would initially seem painful or challenging.
Questioning the Value of Empathy
In his book 'Against Empathy', Bloom argues that empathy, often considered a moral imperative, can lead to biased and irrational decisions. He suggests that feeling empathy may inhibit our ability to make fair judgments about others, particularly when it favors those within our in-group while neglecting those outside it. Bloom posits that empathy may sometimes exacerbate conflicts, such as in war scenarios, by heightening emotions towards our own group without extending the same feelings to others. Instead, he advocates for a more rational approach to compassion, asserting it may produce better moral outcomes.
The Challenge of Making Moral Choices
The discussion highlights the difficulty of aligning personal desires with moral convictions, especially in Bloom's own struggle with meat consumption despite his understanding of its moral implications. He acknowledges the cognitive dissonance that arises when knowledge of right and wrong does not translate into action, reflecting a common human experience. This candid admission underscores a broader theme of moral inconsistency that many face, where intentions do not always match behavior. The conversation encourages a gradual approach to change, suggesting that while perfection may be unattainable, small steps towards ethical living are valuable.
Rethinking the Role of Rationality in Morality
Bloom argues for the importance of rationality in moral decision-making, suggesting that it should not be overshadowed by emotional responses such as empathy. He emphasizes that emotions, while significant, can cloud judgment and lead to inconsistent moral choices. Citing examples from psychological research, he posits that a reliance on rational thought can enhance moral reasoning and lead to a greater understanding of moral progress. Bloom argues that fostering a balance between reason and emotion can better guide individuals toward ethical behavior and a deeper comprehension of morality.
Paul Bloom is Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto, and Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Yale University. Paul Bloom studies how children and adults make sense of the world.
Paul Bloom delves into the intricacies of morality, debates the importance of reason over emotion in making moral decisions, and argues for the power of reason to help distinguish between rational and irrational reactions. Along with Peter and Kasia, Paul explores the significance of pleasure, distinguishing between short-term pleasures and long-term happiness, and the psychological aspects underpinning our attachment to objects with historical value.