Strict Scrutiny The Hubris and Hackery of Aileen Cannon
31 snips
Jul 22, 2024 
Legal experts Josie Duffy Rice, Kathrina Szymborski Wolfkot, and writer Kyle Barry discuss relying on state courts and state constitutional law in addressing criminal legal system challenges. They delve into the hubris and hackery of Judge Aileen Cannon's decision on the Trump classified documents case, highlighting the promises and challenges of state courts in enforcing rights against extreme punishments and shaping federal law.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Intro
00:00 • 2min
The Controversial Florida Case against Donald Trump and the Judge's Actions
02:05 • 2min
Analysis of Judge Cannon's Handling of Nixon Decision
03:36 • 22min
Legal Action Against Political Opponent and State Constitutional Law
25:06 • 8min
Enforcing Rights Against Extreme Punishments
32:52 • 14min
State Supreme Courts Asserting Independence on Extreme Sentences
46:54 • 10min
Exploring Overlooked Black History and Learning Programs for Kids
57:01 • 3min
The Role of State Courts in Enforcing Rights and Influencing Federal Law
59:55 • 16min
Appreciation for Hosts' Work and Legal Organizations in State Courts
01:16:02 • 2min
Progressive Merchandise, Show Acknowledgments, and Podcast Recommendations
01:18:16 • 3min