Strict Scrutiny cover image

The Hubris and Hackery of Aileen Cannon

Strict Scrutiny

00:00

Analysis of Judge Cannon's Handling of Nixon Decision

The chapter dives into Justice Thomas's concurrence in the Trump immunity opinion and focuses on Aileen Cannon's argument, critiquing her opinion for failing to align with established executive branch practices and statutory text. The episode delves into the historical context of special counsel appointments by attorneys general, highlighting key moments like the Ethics in Government Act from 1978 to 1999 and the Department of Justice's regulations post-1999. The hosts also discuss a court case challenging justiciability in dispute resolution and a lawyer's extreme textualist interpretation, paralleling hubris in recent Supreme Court opinions with a district court judge's approach.

Transcript
Play full episode

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app