Fast Talk
315: Is Cadence Work a Waste of Time?
Apr 18, 2024
Dr. Ernst Hansen, an ex-professional cyclist and researcher from University College Absalon in Denmark, shares his expertise on the often-debated topic of cadence work in cycling. He reveals that the science behind high and low cadence training is unclear and highlights individual variability in cadence preferences among athletes. The conversation encompasses the physiological impacts of low cadence training, the significance of training metrics, and how early experiences shape future success. Hansen encourages open-mindedness in exploring varied training methods.
01:11:45
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Cadence training, although widely practiced, lacks conclusive scientific backing that confirms its necessity for all cyclists' performance enhancement.
- Individual responses to cadence variation highlight the importance of personalized training strategies tailored to a cyclist's fitness level and history.
Deep dives
The Role of Cadence in Professional Cycling
Cadence training is a common practice among professional cyclists, who often engage in both high and low cadence workouts. Proponents argue that these exercises are critical for developing skills and performance in cycling. However, research indicates that there may be limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of cadence work, raising questions about whether this training is necessary. Cyclists are encouraged to include cadence variation to enhance their training experience and potentially improve performance.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
