

Rational Security: The “Sweet Dreams Are Made of Cheese” Edition
Oct 1, 2025
Alan Rozenshtein, Lawfare's Research Director and constitutional law professor, joins Anna Bower, Senior Editor and litigation correspondent, to dive into provocative national security issues. They dissect the controversial indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, raising questions about politicization within the DOJ. The conversation shifts to California's new law limiting law enforcement’s mask usage and its constitutional implications. Lastly, they explore groundbreaking AI safety legislation, debating its potential impact on public safety and industry compliance.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Unusual Process Suggests Political Pressure
- The Comey indictment illustrates deep procedural and ethical concerns at DOJ, not just factual disputes.
- Rapid personnel changes and a bare-bones indictment suggest political influence over prosecutorial judgment.
Career Prosecutors' Refusal Is Telling
- Alan Rozenshtein calls this prosecution a collapse of DOJ as a rule-of-law institution.
- He highlights the bare-bones indictment and absence of career prosecutors as evidence of improper politicization.
Use Vindictive Prosecution Motion Early
- Comey's defense should strongly consider a vindictive prosecution motion given public evidence of animus.
- That motion could force discovery and potentially lead to dismissal on process grounds.