Alan Z. Rozenshtein

Renée DiResta, an Associate Research Professor at Georgetown focusing on disinformation, and Alan Rozenshtein, an AI law expert at Minnesota, dive into the Trump Administration's 'Woke AI' executive order. They discuss the intricate challenges of ensuring ideological neutrality in AI systems and the clash between federal procurement and First Amendment rights. The conversation also highlights potential biases in AI, the regulatory landscape, and how current policies could shape future developments in the AI sector, emphasizing transparency and accountability.

This week, Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor focused on AI and cybersecurity, and Kevin Frazier, an expert in technology policy, delve into the latest developments in AI regulation. They discuss Trump's repeal of strict limits on AI technology diffusion and its implications for U.S. global strategy. The duo also tackle the federal preemption of state AI legislation and its potential risks to public accountability. With humor, they reflect on personal experiences with technology and the broader societal impact of AI on children.

In this lively discussion, Benjamin Wittes, editor at Lawfare, and legal scholar Alan Z. Rozenshtein join Senior Editor Kate Klonick to delve into pressing national security issues. They dissect the Heritage Foundation’s crisis surrounding antisemitism and the complexities it reveals within the conservative movement. The trio also explores the stalled TikTok deal with China, highlighting institutional challenges and missed expectations. Additionally, they address the implications of wartime rhetoric in contemporary U.S. counter-narcotics efforts, raising concerns about legal foundations.

This week, Benjamin Wittes, a veteran national security commentator, Alan Z. Rozenshtein, a legal expert, and Kate Klonick, an authority on internet law, delve into a fascinating mix of topics. They explore the fallout from the Heritage Foundation's controversial support for Tucker Carlson, addressing anti-Semitism and the political implications. The trio also discusses the stalled TikTok deal and its broader legal ramifications, alongside the dangerous re-emergence of wartime rhetoric in domestic policies. Their insights reveal deep intersections of politics, technology, and societal values.

Alan Rozenshtein, Lawfare's Research Director and constitutional law professor, joins Anna Bower, Senior Editor and litigation correspondent, to dive into provocative national security issues. They dissect the controversial indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, raising questions about politicization within the DOJ. The conversation shifts to California's new law limiting law enforcement’s mask usage and its constitutional implications. Lastly, they explore groundbreaking AI safety legislation, debating its potential impact on public safety and industry compliance.

From September 18, 2024: Jane Bambauer, Professor at Levin College of Law; Ramya Krishnan, Senior Staff Attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute and a lecturer in law at Columbia Law School; Alan Rozenshtein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School and a Senior Editor at Lawfare, join Kevin Frazier, Assistant Professor at St. Thomas University College of Law and a Tarbell Fellow at Lawfare, to break down the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ hearing in TikTok v. Garland, in which a panel of judges assessed the constitutionality of the TikTok bill.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this engaging discussion, co-hosts emeritus Benjamin Wittes, Shane Harris, Quinta Jurecic, and Alan Z. Rozenshtein dive into the impact of online subcultures on political violence, examining the dynamics behind radicalization. They analyze Russia's recent drone incursions into NATO territories and the implications for alliance security. The group also critiques the TikTok divestment law and its effects on the rule of law. To lighten the mood, they recommend compelling books and TV shows, including Shane's shout-out to the Emmy-winning 'Somebody Somewhere'.

Shane Harris, a national security journalist from The Atlantic, discusses the link between online radicalization and recent gun violence incidents. Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of Lawfare, warns that Russian gray-zone warfare efforts, especially drone incursions, remain under-discussed. Quinta Jurecic shares intriguing data on the outcomes of federal law enforcement actions in D.C. Lastly, Alan Z. Rozenshtein highlights the troubling disregard for the TikTok ban by the Trump administration, raising concerns over executive power.

Susan Landau, a cybersecurity expert from Tufts University, and Alan Rozenshtein, a national security law scholar at the University of Minnesota, engage in a heated discussion about end-to-end encryption. They analyze recent FBI recommendations endorsing encrypted messaging in light of cybersecurity threats. The debate touches on the 'Going Dark' issue, the balance between privacy and security, and how law enforcement must adapt to modern encryption challenges. Their insights highlight the vital role of encryption in protecting personal data amid evolving threats.

In this insightful discussion, Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, Anupam Chander from Georgetown, and Mary-Rose Papandrea of the University of North Carolina dive into the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling on TikTok. They dissect the legal complexities surrounding the app, particularly its First Amendment implications and national security concerns tied to its Chinese ownership. The conversation also critiques the government's rationale about data privacy, showcasing the ongoing tension between digital innovation and regulatory scrutiny.