Alan Z. Rozenshtein

Renée DiResta, an Associate Research Professor at Georgetown focusing on disinformation, and Alan Rozenshtein, an AI law expert at Minnesota, dive into the Trump Administration's 'Woke AI' executive order. They discuss the intricate challenges of ensuring ideological neutrality in AI systems and the clash between federal procurement and First Amendment rights. The conversation also highlights potential biases in AI, the regulatory landscape, and how current policies could shape future developments in the AI sector, emphasizing transparency and accountability.

This week, Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor focused on AI and cybersecurity, and Kevin Frazier, an expert in technology policy, delve into the latest developments in AI regulation. They discuss Trump's repeal of strict limits on AI technology diffusion and its implications for U.S. global strategy. The duo also tackle the federal preemption of state AI legislation and its potential risks to public accountability. With humor, they reflect on personal experiences with technology and the broader societal impact of AI on children.

Susan Landau, a cybersecurity expert from Tufts University, and Alan Rozenshtein, a national security law scholar at the University of Minnesota, engage in a heated discussion about end-to-end encryption. They analyze recent FBI recommendations endorsing encrypted messaging in light of cybersecurity threats. The debate touches on the 'Going Dark' issue, the balance between privacy and security, and how law enforcement must adapt to modern encryption challenges. Their insights highlight the vital role of encryption in protecting personal data amid evolving threats.

In this insightful discussion, Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, Anupam Chander from Georgetown, and Mary-Rose Papandrea of the University of North Carolina dive into the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling on TikTok. They dissect the legal complexities surrounding the app, particularly its First Amendment implications and national security concerns tied to its Chinese ownership. The conversation also critiques the government's rationale about data privacy, showcasing the ongoing tension between digital innovation and regulatory scrutiny.

Over the past few years, TikTok has become a uniquely polarizing social media platform. On the one hand, millions of users, especially those in their teens and twenties, love the app. On the other hand, the government is concerned that TikTok's vulnerability to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party makes it a serious national security threat. There's even talk of banning the app altogether. But would that be legal? In particular, does the First Amendment allow the government to ban an application that’s used by millions to communicate every day?On this episode of Arbiters of Truth, our series on the information ecosystem, Matt Perault, director of the Center on Technology Policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Alan Z. Rozenshtein, Lawfare Senior Editor and Associate Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota, spoke with Ramya Krishnan, a staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and Mary-Rose Papendrea, the Samuel Ashe Distinguished Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of North Carolina School of Law, to think through the legal and policy implications of a TikTok ban.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.