Josh Szeps, former host of the morning show Wake Up Ya C***s, joins the hosts to discuss the treatment of Coleman Hughes by TED, the politics of Australia's 'voice' referendum, Aussie identity politics, and the uncomfortable conversations on his podcast. They also explore the controversy surrounding a TED talk, moderation in TED, the vote for an indigenous advisory body, disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, and the late Norm McDonald.
The voice vote in Australia aims to create an advisory body for indigenous peoples, but faces challenges due to concerns about representation and implementation.
The debate on the voice vote reflects deeper issues of systemic discrimination and the challenges of finding equitable and meaningful solutions.
Opinions on the voice vote are diverse, with arguments ranging from the need to address historical injustices to questions about the effectiveness and constitutionality of the proposal.
The outcome of the voice vote could have far-reaching implications for the reconciliation, historical injustices, and indigenous rights in Australia.
Deep dives
The voice vote in Australia
The voice vote in Australia is a proposed change to the constitution that aims to create an advisory body made up of representatives from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. The body would provide advice to the Australian Parliament on matters that impact indigenous peoples. The vote is contentious and faces significant challenges as it requires a double majority, meaning a majority of voters in a majority of states. There is significant debate and criticism surrounding the proposal, with arguments ranging from concerns about unequal treatment to questions about the effectiveness and representation of the advisory body.
Complex history of indigenous rights in Australia
The vote on the voice proposal is part of a larger conversation on indigenous rights in Australia. The country has a complex history of colonization, dispossession, and racist policies towards indigenous peoples. Efforts to address and rectify these historical injustices have been ongoing, with varying degrees of success. The debate around the voice vote reflects deeper issues of systemic discrimination and the challenges of finding equitable and meaningful solutions.
Different perspectives on the voice vote
Opinions on the voice vote are diverse, with both proponents and opponents voicing their concerns. Supporters argue that the advisory body is necessary to address historical injustices and provide a platform for indigenous voices in decision-making processes. Critics raise questions about the effectiveness, fairness, and constitutionality of the proposal. Additionally, there are alternative proposals, such as calls for a treaty and broader recognition of indigenous sovereignty, that advocate for different approaches to addressing indigenous rights.
Challenges and implications of the vote
The vote on the voice proposal faces significant challenges, from the need for a double majority to concerns about representation and implementation. The outcome of the vote could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, as well as for the national conversation on reconciliation, historical injustices, and indigenous rights. The debate surrounding the vote highlights the ongoing efforts to address and rectify historical injustices and build a more equitable and inclusive society in Australia.
Main Idea 1
The podcast episode discusses the ongoing debates and discussions surrounding the issues faced by First Nations people in Australia, including the treaty proposals and the need for practical solutions to improve their lives.
Main Idea 2
The episode explores the argument for and against the creation of a new body in the Constitution to represent Indigenous Australians, with some questioning the need for long-term inclusion while others advocate for addressing disparities and improving outcomes.
Main Idea 3
The conversation highlights the complexities of addressing Indigenous issues, including the intersection of race, class, and geography, and the challenges of finding effective solutions that go beyond racial categorization.
Main Idea 4
The podcast reflects on the evolving attitudes towards Indigenous Australians in recent decades, emphasizing the cultural awakening and shift in public perception, while also acknowledging the need for practical approaches to resolving historical disparities.
Our old Aussie-Aussie-Aussie-Oi-Oi-Oi pal Josh Szeps, former host of the morning show Wake Up Ya C***s, was in New York this weekend and stopped by the Fifth’s Chinatown headquarters! So we decided to have a few drinks (Ed. note: Josh has lost approximately 600 pounds and is now sober, while Welch and Moynihan are still the same old lazy alcoholics) and argue about how our pal Coleman Hughes was treated by TED…receive a concise primer on the politics of Australia’s “voice” referendum…get an equally concise lesson in Aussie identity politics… promote his terrific podcast “Uncomfortable Conversations”…and recount a recent conversation that was so uncomfortable that it has been permanently disappeared.
This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.wethefifth.com/subscribe
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode