

Kick Trump Off the Ballot? Even Liberal Justices Are Skeptical
24 snips Feb 9, 2024
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, delves into the controversial ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court deeming Donald Trump ineligible for the ballot due to his role in the January 6 insurrection. He discusses constitutional implications of the 14th Amendment and the arguments heard by the Supreme Court justices. Liptak highlights the complex legal challenges surrounding Trump's candidacy and reflects on the potential impact this case could have on the upcoming election and voter rights.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Biggest Election Case Since Bush v. Gore
- The Supreme Court heard arguments on whether Donald Trump is eligible for the 2024 ballot.
- This case hinges on the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause.
Trump's Lawyer's Argument
- Trump's lawyer, Jonathan Mitchell, argues the 14th Amendment doesn't explicitly bar presidents.
- He claims it only applies to appointed officials, not elected ones like the president.
Colorado Voters' Argument
- Lawyer Jason Murray, for the Colorado voters, argues Section 3 applies to all insurrectionists.
- He claims the Constitution lets states ensure voters don't waste votes on ineligible candidates.