Risk Parity Radio

Episode 431: Websites And Roundtables And A Couple New Funds And Gold vs. Bonds

Jun 11, 2025
Listeners dive into the psychological hurdles of risk parity investing, where lower returns during booms offer greater crash protection. The importance of sound forecasting techniques and the critiques of the CAPE ratio illustrate the challenges ahead. New investment vehicles, like the AVUQ ETF, spark discussions about quality growth companies. Finally, the debate on gold versus bonds for portfolio diversification adds a layer of intrigue, as hosts balance the pros and cons of spending versus saving.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Base Rates Beat CAPE Forecasts

  • The best forecasting relies on base rates, or long-term historical averages, rather than trying to predict market conditions with valuation metrics like CAPE ratios.
  • Using CAPE ratios to adjust safe withdrawal rates prospectively has been shown to be less accurate and more wrong than simply using historical averages.
INSIGHT

Beware Bad Forecasting Practices

  • Bad financial forecasting often stems from improper assumptions compounded over time in calculators.
  • Using historical data series reduces the error compared to overly optimistic or pessimistic predictions.
INSIGHT

Risk Parity's Psychological Challenge

  • Risk parity portfolios underperform during bull markets but offer superior protection in crashes, allowing more spending now rather than maximizing wealth at death.
  • The fundamental trade-off is accepting lower returns in good times for better downside risk management.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app