

Francis Fukuyama on coronavirus and the crisis of trust
Apr 16, 2020
Gideon Rachman hosts Francis Fukuyama, Stanford political scientist and author known for his insights on trust and democracy. They delve into the varied political responses to the pandemic, revealing no clear advantage between regime types. Fukuyama emphasizes that social trust is crucial for public compliance with health measures. He examines the impact of American polarization on trust and governance, and how global populism has eroded faith in experts. Their discussion ends with a reflection on whether the current crisis might incite meaningful political reforms.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
No Clear Link Between Regime Type And Outcome
- Regime type (democracy vs authoritarian) does not consistently predict pandemic performance.
- Performance varies widely within both democracies and authoritarian states based on other factors.
Trust Is Central To Public Compliance
- Social trust depends on perceived competence and public-spirited motives of leaders and institutions.
- High trust yields compliance with difficult rules, while low trust undermines pandemic responses.
Competence, Not System Type, Builds Trust
- Both democracies and some authoritarian states can command trust when citizens believe governments are competent.
- Democracies generally enjoy higher trust because they rest on consent of the governed.