Future Tense Reassessing the laws of war; and why progress isn't always a straight line
7 snips
Jun 5, 2025 In this discussion, Sean Watts, a law professor at West Point, Lee Fennell from the University of Chicago, and Barry de Vries, a research fellow at Justus Liebig University, explore the fragile state of international arms control. They delve into the resurgence of landmine use and the challenges posed by AI-controlled weapons. The guests debate the ethical dilemmas nations face between defense and treaty obligations amidst geopolitical tensions. Their insights highlight the nonlinear nature of progress in law and warfare, advocating for deeper reflection on societal change.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
European Treaty Withdrawals Increasing
- Several European countries are reconsidering their arms control commitments due to new security threats.
- This includes withdrawing from treaties like the Ottawa Convention and cluster munitions bans.
Ottawa Convention's Wartime Limits
- The Ottawa Convention banning landmines has wide ratification but faces challenges in conflicts like Ukraine.
- Conflicting legal obligations between parties complicate adherence and enforcement in wartime.
Military Necessity vs. Legal Obligations
- Military necessity is being prioritized over legal treaty obligations in wartime.
- This risks a dangerous slippery slope to violating more humanitarian laws under existential threats.