George Monbiot and Patrick Holden engage in a two-part debate on whether everyone should go vegan. Monbiot argues that livestock farming contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and is wasteful of resources, while Holden provides counterarguments regarding the carbon cost of growing crops and the importance of grazing livestock. The podcast explores the environmental impacts of animal-based diets, the need for a switch to plant-based diets, and innovative approaches to food production.
Industrial livestock farming contributes significantly to carbon emissions, land use, and loss of wildlife habitats, highlighting the need for transitioning to sustainable farming systems.
Sustainable farming practices, such as regenerative grazing and the cultivation of microbes, offer potential solutions to reduce the environmental impact of food production while maintaining or enhancing food security.
Deep dives
The Case Against Industrial Livestock Farming and the Environmental Consequences
Industrial livestock farming, which constitutes a significant portion of current farming systems, is environmentally devastating for animal welfare, carbon emissions, and land use. Studies have shown that livestock farms have failed to prove carbon negative practices, and the grazing systems implemented have not matched the carbon storage capabilities of natural ecosystems like forests. Additionally, the reliance on animals for food production leads to significant agricultural sprawl, causing the loss of trees and wildlife habitats. The solution lies in transitioning to sustainable farming systems that prioritize plant-based diets, rebuilding ecosystems, and reducing overall agricultural land area.
The Potential of Grazing Livestock as Part of Sustainable Farming Systems
Supporters of grazing livestock argue that sustainable farming systems, which involve rotational grazing and grass-fed diets, can lead to carbon negativity and biodiversity preservation. Some farms report carbon-negative outcomes, suggesting that grazing practices can enhance soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, they contend that scaling up these regenerative farming practices nation-wide and globally can maintain or enhance food security while allowing for the revitalization of soil and ecosystems. The goal is to shift away from industrial forms of livestock farming, such as factory farms, while keeping well-managed grazing livestock as part of holistic and sustainable farming systems.
The Potential of Farming Microbes for Food Production
Beyond traditional plant-based diets, proponents of sustainable food production advocate for the farming of unicellular organisms, also known as microbes. This innovative approach, still at an early stage, could revolutionize human diets and environmental sustainability. Growing microbes as a protein source, using methods such as hydro and all methanol, has the potential to drastically reduce land, water, and fertilizer usage. It offers superior substitutes for animal products compared to traditional plant-based alternatives. Furthermore, the cultivation of microbes could trigger new cuisines and drastically decrease the environmental impact of food production.
The Need for Continued Research and Open Dialogue
To address the complex issues surrounding sustainable food production, continued research, open dialogue, and evidence-based assessments are crucial. The evaluation of soil carbon sequestration outcomes, exploration of grazing practices, and investigation of alternative food sources like microbial farming are needed to inform future agricultural practices. Collaboration and understanding between proponents of different approaches is necessary to find practical solutions that prioritize the environment, improve food security, and reduce the overall ecological impact of human diets.
In this two-part debate, George Monbiot, Guardian columnist, environmental campaigner and author of Regenesis: Feeding the World without Devouring the Planet, argues for the motion We Should All Go Vegan. Patrick Holden, Founder and chief executive of the Sustainable Food Trust, argues against it. Our chair is Alice Thomson, Columnist and interviewer at The Times.
Livestock farming contributes 14.5% of human-produced greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Farm animals belch out massive amounts of methane, one of the most harmful greenhouse gases. They are also extremely wasteful of resources, using up 83% of farmland worldwide while providing only 18% of our calories, guzzling soya and grain that could feed humans more efficiently, and requiring vast amounts of water. As for our health, vegan sports stars such as Venus and Serena Williams and Lewis Hamilton prove that you can be superfit on a plant-based diet, and research has linked vegan diets to lower rates of some diseases. That’s the argument made by the vegan lobby. But there are many experts who disagree on all counts. Take the environment. Few people realise the high carbon cost of growing crops – some 15-20% of the world’s CO2 output comes from ploughing – and that plants grown for food require vast amounts of fertiliser and pesticides that are derived from fossil fuels. Who’s right and who’s wrong?
We’d love to hear your feedback and what you think we should talk about next, who we should have on and what our future debates should be.
Send us an email or voice note with your thoughts to podcasts@intelligencesquared.com or Tweet us @intelligence2.
And if you’d like to support our mission to foster honest debate and compelling conversations, as well as ad-free podcasts, exclusive bonus content, early access and much more, become a supporter of Intelligence Squared.
Just visit intelligencesquared.com/membership to find out more.